More fun at http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16706.
If nobody raises its voice, I'll just forward the current archive there to
Arne for release.
Best,
JP
On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 12:35:38 PM UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 12:30:15 PM UTC+2, François wrote:
On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 12:30:15 PM UTC+2, François wrote:
>
> In that case the README.
>
Done, I've updated evrything.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send a
In that case the README. The overzealous may add a note to the COPYING
file if there is one.
On 23/07/2014, at 22:23, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 12:20:06 PM UTC+2, François wrote:
> I would put a line in SPKG.txt personally. I don't think the change log is
> ap
On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 12:20:06 PM UTC+2, François wrote:
>
> I would put a line in SPKG.txt personally. I don’t think the change log is
> appropriate for credits of that kind.
>
I meant the IML ChangeLog (autotools stuff) file.
I could also add a line in the README there.
--
You receiv
I would put a line in SPKG.txt personally. I don't think the change log is
appropriate for credits of that kind.
On 23/07/2014, at 22:14, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 12:10:34 PM UTC+2, François wrote:
> From the website:
> http://www.netlib.org/blas/faq.html#2
On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 12:10:34 PM UTC+2, François wrote:
>
> From the website:
> http://www.netlib.org/blas/faq.html#2
>
> and more precisely:
> "We only ask that proper credit be given to the authors.”
>
> Would the line in the ChangeLog mentioning the inclusion be enough?
--
You re
>From the website:
http://www.netlib.org/blas/faq.html#2
and more precisely:
"We only ask that proper credit be given to the authors."
François
On 23/07/2014, at 22:07, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 12:00:20 PM UTC+2, François wrote:
> The whole netlib Blas/lapack
On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 12:00:20 PM UTC+2, François wrote:
>
> The whole netlib Blas/lapack is under the original BSD license. As for the
> examples.patch
>
So what should be done if we just want to include it?
Don't whant to think about licenses now.
(Note that for mysterious reason, ever
The whole netlib Blas/lapack is under the original BSD license. As for the
examples.patch
I have no idea.
François
On 23/07/2014, at 21:52, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm in contact with Arne to craft a new IML release including all our patches
> and would need some help to make
Dear all,
I'm in contact with Arne to craft a new IML release including all our
patches and would need some help to make sure everything is fine.
I've put a trac branch at u/jpflori/iml-1.0.4, a tarball and the
corresponding patches (on top of iml-1.0.3, just apply them in alphabetical
order) a
10 matches
Mail list logo
