On 03/15/16 09:28, François Bissey wrote:
On 03/15/16 05:23, Victor Shoup wrote:
That is a bummer with the C++11 issues.
The way I see it, C++11 is the future, and pretty much all
C++ must eventually deal with it.
Looking over the build issues with singular -- if the make files don't
respect CF
For eclib: in its configure.ac there is this:
# Uncomment this to check for C++-11 compliance (no C++-11 features are used)
#AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_11([],[optional])
so perhaps uncommenting that will make it work with the new NTL
without any further tweaking? I don't have time to do this now but
> On 17/03/2016, at 21:59, John Cremona wrote:
>
> For eclib: in its configure.ac there is this:
>
> # Uncomment this to check for C++-11 compliance (no C++-11 features are used)
> #AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_11([],[optional])
>
> so perhaps uncommenting that will make it work with the new NTL
> wi
I remember that you mentioned some time ago that you were working on a
solving (or working around) GMP's horrid error handling (especially with
respect to memory errors). Did you make any progress on that front?
Cheers,
Francesco.
On 12 March 2016 at 22:32, Victor Shoup wrote:
> Just release
On 03/15/16 05:23, Victor Shoup wrote:
That is a bummer with the C++11 issues.
The way I see it, C++11 is the future, and pretty much all
C++ must eventually deal with it.
Looking over the build issues with singular -- if the make files don't
respect CFLAGS or CXXFLAGS, then maybe one can make
t
That is a bummer with the C++11 issues.
The way I see it, C++11 is the future, and pretty much all
C++ must eventually deal with it.
Looking over the build issues with singular -- if the make files don't
respect CFLAGS or CXXFLAGS, then maybe one can make
the g++ command itself be a script that ca
By the way with thread disabled the update to ntl-9.7.0 in sage is almost
trivial and doesn’t require any doctests change, I tested a few hours ago in
sage-on-gentoo (I was already at 9.6.4 before that).
François
> On 13/03/2016, at 22:55, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Surely we can compile singular
With threads enabled NTL includes c++11 headers that then get included in
singular:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572626
> On 13/03/2016, at 22:55, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Surely we can compile singular with different cflags than NTL? Or is it a
> linking problem?
>
>
> On Sunday,
Surely we can compile singular with different cflags than NTL? Or is it a
linking problem?
On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 2:17:15 AM UTC+1, François wrote:
>
> Thanks for adding a way to make binaries without avx/fma.
>
> The threading unfortunately requires C++11 (unless it changed).
> In turns
Thanks for adding a way to make binaries without avx/fma.
The threading unfortunately requires C++11 (unless it changed).
In turns the inclusion of c++11 flags breaks the building of the
singular version shipped in sage. I don’t know about singular 4
but it wouldn’t surprise me if it did too.
F
Just released a new version of NTL!
In a nutshell: faster, better matrix arithmetic over zz_p (small moduli),
some improved thread pooling facilities,
and several other small improvements.
For more details, go here: http://shoup.net/ntl/doc/tour-changes.html
--
You received this message because
11 matches
Mail list logo
