>> I would like to propose the addition of a matrix literal syntax, namely
>>
>> sage: [1, 2; 3, 4]
>> [1 2]
>> [3 4]
> +1
+1 from me as well
>
>> A second question, what of the basering?
>
> Consistency with "[Mm]atrix([[1,2],[3,4]])" would be most clear. So would
> you argue to change basering o
Op 26-01-2012 8:22, Robert Bradshaw schreef:
I would like to propose the addition of a matrix literal syntax, namely
sage: [1, 2; 3, 4]
[1 2]
[3 4]
+1
even gp has this
A second question, what of the basering?
Consistency with "[Mm]atrix([[1,2],[3,4]])" would be most clear. So
would you a
I would like to propose the addition of a matrix literal syntax, namely
sage: [1, 2; 3, 4]
[1 2]
[3 4]
sage: [1, 2; 3, 4] * [5, 6; 7, 8]
[19 22]
[43 50]
Currently one must write
sage: matrix([[1, 2], [3, 4]])
[1 2]
[3 4]
sage: matrix([[1, 2], [3, 4]]) * matrix([[5, 6], [7, 8]])
[19 22]
[43 50]
