On 2015-09-17 17:47, John Cremona wrote:
I think so: I noticed that the optional package
database_cremona_ellcurve has no dependencies file (after I pulled in
the beta7 edition of the develop branch).
Let me first explain the two kinds of dependencies that "make" supports:
there are normal de
Hey John,
> Is the non-existence of a dependencies file valid for a package with
> none? I think so: I noticed that the optional package
> database_cremona_ellcurve has no dependencies file (after I pulled in
> the beta7 edition of the develop branch). But I also tried "sage -i
> database_
On 17 September 2015 at 16:16, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Jeroen Demeyer
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> the logic for installing packages in Sage has changed recently. Let me
>> explain what changed:
>>
>> The command "sage -i PKGNAME" now only supports new-style packages.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the logic for installing packages in Sage has changed recently. Let me
> explain what changed:
>
> The command "sage -i PKGNAME" now only supports new-style packages. The
> PKGNAME should be a bare package name (no version numbers
Hello,
the logic for installing packages in Sage has changed recently. Let me
explain what changed:
The command "sage -i PKGNAME" now only supports new-style packages. The
PKGNAME should be a bare package name (no version numbers or URLs or
whatever).
Packages are now installed *with* depe
