Re: [sage-devel] Improving the documentation...

2012-02-20 Thread Florent Hivert
Hi, > I think Sage documentation is quite good, but with a big flaw: it is > widely missing for cross links. Many classes and methods could greatly > benefit from a "SEE ALSO" section. I would like to advertise for this... If > patch writer and reviewer tries to more or less systematical

Re: [sage-devel] Improving the documentation...

2011-11-23 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2011-11-23 11:50, Florent Hivert wrote: > I'm also volunteering to > add a section about that in the developer guide. What do you think ? That would be very cool. I have often thought about making "See Also" links, but I never know how to do it. Of course, the "see also" links really should b

[sage-devel] Improving the documentation...

2011-11-23 Thread Florent Hivert
Hi there, I think Sage documentation is quite good, but with a big flaw: it is widely missing for cross links. Many classes and methods could greatly benefit from a "SEE ALSO" section. I would like to advertise for this... If patch writer and reviewer tries to more or less systematical