Re: [sage-devel] Guidance on packaging snapshots of external packages

2025-05-08 Thread Tony Luo
On Wednesday, May 7, 2025 at 9:42:17 PM UTC-4 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > It looks like the only conflicts are in the files under "Tst", which I > assume are test files. If you edit those hunks out of the patch the > rest should apply cleanly on top of singular-4.4.1. I did a quick > build & tes

Re: [sage-devel] Guidance on packaging snapshots of external packages

2025-05-07 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 2025-05-07 13:28:13, Tony Luo wrote: > Thank you for the detailed response. I actually tried to patch the existing > release with the generated ".patch" file from the GitHub commit URL prior > to just bumping the source. A naive attempt fails (as expected) since there > is quite a large set o

Re: [sage-devel] Guidance on packaging snapshots of external packages

2025-05-07 Thread Tony Luo
Thank you for the detailed response. I actually tried to patch the existing release with the generated ".patch" file from the GitHub commit URL prior to just bumping the source. A naive attempt fails (as expected) since there is quite a large set of changes between the commit and the current pac

Re: [sage-devel] Guidance on packaging snapshots of external packages

2025-05-07 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 2025-05-07 12:10:00, Tony Luo wrote: > Hi all, > > What is the idiomatic way to package a specific revision of an external > package or rather update an existing external package to a specific > revision? For context, I am working on a PR to bump Singular to commit > 0a4bc0e Ultimately, you

[sage-devel] Guidance on packaging snapshots of external packages

2025-05-07 Thread Tony Luo
Hi all, What is the idiomatic way to package a specific revision of an external package or rather update an existing external package to a specific revision? For context, I am working on a PR to bump Singular to commit 0a4bc0e