[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

[copied from sage-release] -- Forwarded message - From: John Cremona Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 13:47 Subject: Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released To: I just successfully built 9.5 from a fresh tarball. After completing the build I installed (as I usually do) an optional p

[sage-devel] Fwd: sage | Fix some compiler warnings, mostly use size_t for indexing (!46)

please have a look -- Forwarded message - From: Ivan Komarov Date: Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 4:42 AM Subject: Re: sage | Fix some compiler warnings, mostly use size_t for indexing (!46) To: Ivan Komarov started a new discussion on src/sage/geometry/trian

[sage-devel] Fwd: sage | Fix some compiler warnings, mostly use size_t for indexing (!46)

please have a look -- Forwarded message - From: Ivan Komarov Date: Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 4:33 AM Subject: sage | Fix some compiler warnings, mostly use size_t for indexing (!46) To: Ivan Komarov created a merge request: Project:Branches: IvaKom/sage:size_t to sagemath/sage:deve

[sage-devel] Fwd: sage | Fix some compiler warnings, mostly use size_t for indexing (!46)

please have a look: -- Forwarded message - From: Ivan Komarov Date: Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 4:42 AM Subject: Re: sage | Fix some compiler warnings, mostly use size_t for indexing (!46) To: Ivan Komarov started a new discussion on src/sage/schemes/hypere

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-trac] #30000: Implement a Q-curve test for elliptic curves over number fields

I woke up to see ticket #2 sitting there so could not resist. -- Forwarded message - From: sage-trac Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 09:16 Subject: [sage-trac] #3: Implement a Q-curve test for elliptic curves over number fields To: #3: Implement a Q-curve test for elliptic

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-trac] #29314: update GAP to version 4.11

new version of GAP, 4.11, is out, we should upgrade. Here is the ticket. -- Forwarded message - From: sage-trac Date: Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:12 AM Subject: [sage-trac] #29314: update GAP to version 4.11 To: #29314: update GAP to version 4.11 +---

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-trac] #28710: update sagenb to 1.1.3

please review. it's a routine update, but still... -- Forwarded message - From: sage-trac Date: Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:47 PM Subject: Re: [sage-trac] #28710: update sagenb to 1.1.3 To: #28710: update sagenb to 1.1.3 -+-

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-cell] Re: Is sagecell python3-ready?

On sage-cell, Py3 was brought up. I mentioned how permalinks there may cause trouble at the eventual Py3 changeover for Sage, since at the very least print statements will be gone. William brings up an interesting possibility, and I wonder how/whether this would be useful for Sage proper. A

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-trac] #27462: move toolchain into a separate package

I've opened this ticket/task to move to a simpler build system... -- Forwarded message - From: sage-trac Date: Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:25 AM Subject: [sage-trac] #27462: move toolchain into a separate package To: #27462: move toolchain into a separate package

Re: [sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-trac] #26795: Some memory leaks

On Mon, 3 Dec 2018, Dima Pasechnik wrote: An expert in Cython/Python classes needed: __destruct__ is not called for a reason I don't understand. [ Resolution: Should have been __dealloc__ ] I grepped the source, and this was the only __destruct__(). Of course there might be other misnamed me

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-trac] #26795: Some memory leaks

An expert in Cython/Python classes needed: __destruct__ is not called for a reason I don't understand. There is class Graph with a method convexity_properties which calls cdef'd class ConvexityProperties in a separate pyx file. A destructor for the latter is defined as def __destruct__ but is nev

[sage-devel] Fwd: Sage is currently #1 on Hacker News

-- Forwarded message - From: Alex Clemesha Date: Sat, Sep 15, 2018, 2:02 PM Subject: Sage is currently #1 on Hacker News To: William Stein Just wanted to mention: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17995031 in case you were interested :) -Alex -- You received this message b

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-trac] #25814: Upgrade to cysignals 1.7.2

Volker, be reasonable. You should know that there have been unique challenges involved in getting a buildbot set up for Windows, not the least of which being simply the availability of dedicated hardware. In the meantime, I *am* the buildbot for Windows; I build and test each tagged release myself

[sage-devel] Fwd: Sage coding job: combinatorial Hopf algebras, ~3 months, Hong Kong

On Saturday, November 11, 2017 at 11:30:56 AM UTC, amy...@hkbu.edu.hk wrote: > > Hello Sage-combinat community, > > I am an Assistant Professor at Hong Kong Baptist University, and I am > looking to hire a research assistant for ~3 months to work on code related > to combinatorial Hopf algebras

[sage-devel] Fwd: Sage packaging template

On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 at 10:30 Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > I've made a pull request at > https://github.com/mmasdeu/sage_package_template/pull/3 with some changes > and info to skip some of the requirements when using it. > I don't have write acces to that repository so I can't accept your pull r

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-trac-account] Corrections about the function "is_prime" for graphs

This came in via the trac account request. I don't know the sender's email address ... -- h -- Forwarded message -- From: 'Jamel Dammak' via sage-trac-account Date: Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 10:01 PM Subject: [sage-trac-account] Corrections about the function "is_prime" for graphs To

[sage-devel] Fwd: Sage at 2016 MAA Project NExT Networking Lunch

Is any Sage dev going to the MAA Mathfest? If so, email Alissa below. -- Forwarded message -- From: Crans, Alissa Date: Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:23 PM Subject: RE: Sage at 2016 MAA Project NExT Networking Lunch To: William A Stein Hi William, I hope you're doing well. I still

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-trac-account] BUG Report

Dear Debajyoti: Thank you for your report. We appreciate it. sage-devel is one place to report bugs! = Dear all: This is a bug report sent to sage-trac-account. Regards, KnS. -- Forwarded message -- From: Debajyoti Nandi Date: Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:17 AM Subject: [sag

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-trac] #10295: Upgrading pexpect

Is anyone interested in helping to resolve this old pexpect issue? Dealing with the Sage development process and in particular Sage package management is a bit beyond me but François Bissey created a branch almost 5 months ago with an updated version of pexpect that worked with the version of Sage

[sage-devel] Fwd: Sage Math on Raspbian /Raspberry Pi 2

I think we should definitely have a raspbian buildbot. It is tricky because of the hardware limitations, but it should be possible. Another option is to run a virtual machine emulating a raspberry pi. I recently compiled sage 6.5 in such a VM, an it took almost a week. I still have to build a b

[sage-devel] Fwd: Sage Math on Raspbian /Raspberry Pi 2

-- Forwarded message -- From: Roberto Panai Date: Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:00 PM Subject: Sage Math on Raspbian /Raspberry Pi 2 To: wst...@gmail.com Dear William, I just bought one Raspberry Pi 2 and I saw Wolfram Mathematica is already in. Apparently there is not a (updated) binar

Re: [sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-coding-theory] Coding Theory development project. Request-for-comments: New code family and encoder/decoder structu

Hello, It seems that you really implemented a lot of things before creating any ticket on Sage's trac. Be aware that the reviews may be very painful as a result, for some fundamental design decisions may have to be changed in this process. Nathann On 20 February 2015 at 18:32, Dima Pasechnik wr

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-coding-theory] Coding Theory development project. Request-for-comments: New code family and encoder/decoder structu

-- Forwarded message -- From: "Johan S. R. Nielsen" Date: 20 Feb 2015 17:24 Subject: [sage-coding-theory] Coding Theory development project. Request-for-comments: New code family and encoder/decoder structu To: Cc: Hello everyone, As we announced previously ( https://groups.goog

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-support] Bug in polynomial GCD (FLINT)

If ever there was a blocker, surely this is it! John -- Forwarded message -- From: Anton Mellit Date: 16 February 2015 at 23:54 Subject: [sage-support] Bug in polynomial GCD (FLINT) To: sage-supp...@googlegroups.com Here is the code: R.=QQ[] X=3*q^12 - 8*q^11 - 24*q^10 - 48*q^

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-cloud] Google Summer of Code Alternative

I'm forwarding this to the sage-devel list, since sage-cloud isn't sage (and sage-cloud isn't FOSS, so can't participate in this program), but Sage can. -- Forwarded message -- From: Андрей Ширшов Date: Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:19 AM Subject: [sage-cloud] Google Summer of Code Alte

[sage-devel] Fwd: SAGE in the cloud and Python 3

(This is a sage-devel question, not one for me personally or for sage-cloud; please join that mailing list.) For example, Volker remarks "There has been some steady progress by Wilfried Luebbe and André Apitzsch to move towards Python 3. Meta-tickets: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16052 http://

[sage-devel] Fwd: Sage on Ubuntu 13.04

Hi Pablo, At the moment the PPA is 64bit only. I might do 32bit in a few months. There is a binary for 13.04 here: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/sagemath/sage-mirror/linux/32bit/sage-5.10-linux-32bit-ubuntu_13.04-i686-Linux.tar.lzma Regards, Jan -- Forwarded message -- F

Re: [sage-devel] Fwd: Sage Man Page

Hello YMADEC, You might be glad to note that, there is a ticket relevant to this. You might want to apply for a trac account and get involved with the sage development. The Trac Homepage http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ has instructions for requesting a trac account and the ticket you might w

[sage-devel] Fwd: Sage Man Page

-- Forwarded message -- From: "YMADEC" Date: Jul 12, 2013 11:46 AM Subject: Fwd: Sage Man Page To: Cc: Sorry, I forgot attaching the file... Message original Sujet: Sage Man Page Date : Fri, 12 Jul 2013 20:42:07 +0200 De : YMADEC Pour : wst...@gmail.com

[sage-devel] Fwd: Sage Man Page

I haven't read this... -- Forwarded message -- From: "YMADEC" Date: Jul 12, 2013 11:42 AM Subject: Sage Man Page To: Cc: Hello, I'm a new user of Sage and I had some difficulties to find the Sage command-line options. I tried sage -h, that worked, and then I could find the sage

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-algebra] Boundary cases

In a ring of characteristic 0, it seems that 0^0 (= 1) is well-defined. In my view this is correct. It makes it much simpler to define the matrix (e.g. FF a finite field): G = matrix([ [ a^i for a in FF ] for i in range(k) ]) However, in finite fields or any of the the following rings, 0^0 giv

[sage-devel] Fwd: [Sage] #13141: implement constructing the dual of a linear program

As there might be more people interested in this feature, I forward this here. -- Forwarded message -- From: Sage Date: 20 June 2012 12:08 Subject: [Sage] #13141: implement constructing the dual of a linear program To: Cc: sage-t...@googlegroups.com #13141: implement constructi

[sage-devel] Fwd: Sage and LinBox >= 1.3.0

Argh, pressed sent by accident. Now again: Hi [sage-devel], (CC [linbox-devel] FYI) Brice (for [sage-devel]: he's from the LinBox project) and I are at the "Efficient Linear Algebra for Gröbner Basis Computations" workshop at the moment and got kind of sidetracked into updating LinBox in Sage. S

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-edu] Abelian Groups: comments and suggestions

I cannot post to sage-devel so am sending this to a couple of other groups. -- Forwarded message -- From: John Cremona Date: 3 May 2012 22:47 Subject: Re: [sage-edu] Abelian Groups: comments and suggestions To: Rob Beezer Cc: sage-...@googlegroups.com, David Joyner Don't forg

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-trac-account] El Gamal

Hi, I'm forwarding the message below to sage-devel where more people can join in the discussion. -- Forwarded message -- From: charls mathew Date: Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:15 AM Subject: Re: [sage-trac-account] To: sage-trac-account I have an Elgamal Algorithm implementation ba

[sage-devel] Fwd: sage-4.7.alpha4 segfaults on MacOSX

forwarding here, in case someone has seen this... -- Forwarded message -- From: Dima Pasechnik Date: Apr 19, 12:18 am Subject: sage-4.7.alpha4 released To: sage-release on MacOSX (x86 64bits) 10.6.7 Sage built with gcc from Xcode 4 segfaults at startup. (and during the final st

[sage-devel] Fwd: sage-4.7.alpha3 released -ECL problem?

-- Forwarded message -- From: Dima Pasechnik Date: Apr 3, 10:35 pm Subject: sage-4.7.alpha3 released To: sage-release it doesn't build on MacOSX 10.5.8 PPC, getting stuck at ECL. Any idea why? [...] ;*** Lisp core booted ECL (Embeddable Common Lisp) ;;; ;;; Welcome to b

Re: [sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-combinat-devel] permutation group perspectives

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Robert Bradshaw < rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote: > I full heartedly agree with the idea that permutation groups should be able > to act on more than just the set 1..n, using a dictionary to do the mapping > transparently to the user under the hood (and this

Re: [sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-combinat-devel] permutation group perspectives

I full heartedly agree with the idea that permutation groups should be able to act on more than just the set 1..n, using a dictionary to do the mapping transparently to the user under the hood (and this is technically totally feasible). I'm not as convinced that we should throw out the noti

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-combinat-devel] permutation group perspectives

-- Forwarded message -- From: Jason B Hill Date: Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:05 PM Subject: [sage-combinat-devel] permutation group perspectives To: sage-combinat-de...@googlegroups.com This comes after a discussion I had with several at Sage days 20.5 in Toronto relating to the unde

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-support] Is there an efficient method of producing indexed variables?

I forgot to more the conversation below from sage-support to sage-devel. -- Forwarded message -- From: Franco Saliola Date: Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:45 PM Subject: Re: [sage-support] Is there an efficient method of producing indexed variables? To: sage-supp...@googlegroups.com On T

Re: [sage-devel] Fwd: Sage releases

Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Apr 1, 2010, at 8:55 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Robert, before saying +1 to all the above, you should ask yourself if all of the above is practical. IMHO, it is not. I think this is the main point of disagreement, IMHO it is practical and worthwhile (though a lot

Re: [sage-devel] Fwd: Sage releases

On Apr 1, 2010, at 8:55 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Robert Bradshaw wrote: I believe this is very relevant to the discussion that's taking place on sage-devel. Thank you Robert. Forwarding that was very useful. Begin forwarded message: From: William Stein Date: March 21, 2010 11:09:31 AM

Re: [sage-devel] Fwd: Sage releases

Robert Bradshaw wrote: I believe this is very relevant to the discussion that's taking place on sage-devel. Thank you Robert. Forwarding that was very useful. Begin forwarded message: From: William Stein Date: March 21, 2010 11:09:31 AM PDT To: sage-release Subject: [sage-release] Sage re

[sage-devel] Fwd: Sage releases

I believe this is very relevant to the discussion that's taking place on sage-devel. Begin forwarded message: From: William Stein Date: March 21, 2010 11:09:31 AM PDT To: sage-release Subject: [sage-release] Sage releases Reply-To: sage-rele...@googlegroups.com Hi, The last release (sage-

Re: [sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-nt] Embeddings into QQbar hang

On 10 March 2010 18:07, William Stein wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:38 AM, John Cremona wrote: >> I am taking the liberty of forwarding this to sage-devel since it >> seems much too important for just sage-nt.  OK, so that was my machine >> David locked up (apparently!).  It has 128GB of RAM

Re: [sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-nt] Embeddings into QQbar hang

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:38 AM, John Cremona wrote: > I am taking the liberty of forwarding this to sage-devel since it > seems much too important for just sage-nt.  OK, so that was my machine > David locked up (apparently!).  It has 128GB of RAM so does not easily > run out... > > John It is ea

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-nt] Embeddings into QQbar hang

I am taking the liberty of forwarding this to sage-devel since it seems much too important for just sage-nt. OK, so that was my machine David locked up (apparently!). It has 128GB of RAM so does not easily run out... John -- Forwarded message -- From: daveloeffler Date: 10 Mar

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-support] sage-mode completion not quite working with sage 4.3.2

Dear all, My patch #7921 broke tab completion under emacs in 4.3.2 due to a variant of the other tab completion bug. I know how painful this can be, and apologize for this. I just created ticket #8296 for this, and posted a patch which should fix the issue. Please try and review! Best,

[sage-devel] Fwd: SAGE ignores Ctrl-C?!? Is this a bug or a feature

I am forwarding to sage-devel this posting from Simon King (originally to sage-support), since he asks a question which should be debated by developers: see below. -- Forwarded message -- From: Simon King Date: Dec 30, 11:07 am Subject: SAGE ignores Ctrl-C?!? Is this a bug or a

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-grants] Re: A Sage NSF proposal to the Computational Mathematics Program

-- Forwarded message -- From: John H Palmieri Date: Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 7:03 PM Subject: [sage-grants] Re: A Sage NSF proposal to the Computational Mathematics Program To: sage-grants On Nov 20, 4:24 am, William Stein wrote: > Hi, > > Me and several people have been putting to

[sage-devel] Fwd: Sage Participation at Educause 2009

Hi, I am curious if anybody can go to the Educause 2009 conference in Denver,CO. Sun was really hoping there could be some Sage representation, and I can't go. See below if you're interested. William -- Forwarded message -- From: Corinne Cho-Beaulieu Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2009

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-release] Re: Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 released

-- Forwarded message -- From: Minh Nguyen Date: Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:22 PM Subject: Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 released To: sage-rele...@googlegroups.com Hi William, On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:13 PM, William Stein wrote: > I finally fixed this.  See > >    

[sage-devel] Fwd: sage-devel posting problems

I think I have fixed the problem for the case of Peter. But I can't be sure, unless he posts to sage-devel again. -- Forwarded message -- From: Minh Nguyen Date: Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 6:34 AM Subject: Re: sage-devel posting problems To: Peter Cc: sage-devel+ow...@googlegroups.co

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-release] Re: Sage 4.1.1.rc2 released

This seems more appropriate for sage-devel than sage-release. -- Regards Minh Van Nguyen -- Forwarded message -- From: gsw Date: Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 7:33 PM Subject: [sage-release] Re: Sage 4.1.1.rc2 released To: sage-release On 8 Aug., 23:21, David Joyner wrote: > I had

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-release] Re: Sage 4.1.1.rc1 released

I'm forwarding this to sage-devel so more people know about it. -- Regards Minh Van Nguyen -- Forwarded message -- From: Alex Ghitza Date: Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:05 PM Subject: [sage-release] Re: Sage 4.1.1.rc1 released To: sage-rele...@googlegroups.com Built from scratch o

[sage-devel] Fwd: SAGE lecturer needed

I think this is worth forwarding here since I suspect many qualified people don't read sage-edu much. -M. Hampton -- Forwarded message -- From: jan.groenew...@gmail.com Date: Jun 24, 6:13 am Subject: SAGE lecturer needed To: sage-edu Hi, The African Institute for Mathematical

[sage-devel] Fwd: [Sage Bug Report] sage.rings.arith.is_prime is not passing the flag parameter to pari

I'm forwarding this to sage-devel. -- Forwarded message -- From: Sigurd Torkel Meldgaard Date: Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:51 AM Subject: [Sage Bug Report] sage.rings.arith.is_prime is not passing the flag parameter to pari To: wst...@gmail.com Hi sage.rings.arith.is_prime is not pa

[sage-devel] Fwd: Sage 3.4 OS 10.4 PowerPC Install Error

Hi Sage-Devel, Here's yet *another* person that can't use our binary on OS X 10.4 PPC. Michael, can you change the binary name to make it clear that it won't work? Hi Tom, Currently the only way to install sage-3.4 on a G4 is to upgrade an existing install or build from source. William

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-combinat-devel] Documentation...

-- Forwarded message -- From: Florent Hivert Date: Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:44 PM Subject: [sage-combinat-devel] Documentation... To: Sage Combinat Devel      Dear All, I had some trouble with the new documentation system. Therefore I wrote a tiny page on the wiki about it hopi

[sage-devel] Fwd: sage @ Quantnet.org - Financial Engineering Forum

-- Forwarded message -- From: Harald Schilly Date: Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 3:09 AM Subject: sage @ Quantnet.org - Financial Engineering Forum To: William Stein Hi, my google-alert just told me about this. I think you maybe want to follow that thread or answer there! http://www.qu

[sage-devel] Fwd: Sage & Sun Followup

Hi Sage-Devel, Is anybody here interested in possibly giving a talk about Sage at Sun's CommunityOne open source conference in San Francisco June 1-3? If so, see below. -- William "Hi Michael, William, I've heard back from the program committees of CommunityOne. San Francisco June 1-3 is sti

[sage-devel] Fwd: [Sage] #4249: [with patch] Inconsistency in number field integral bases

John Voight and I are having trouble with the patch I attached to #4249 (see below). On my machines I get a doctest failure, while on his he does not. Please could someone else try? the patch should apply equally to 3.1.3 or 3.1.4. John -- Forwarded message -- From: Sage <[EM

[sage-devel] Fwd: [SAGE] #3102: [with patch, with review, issue remains] debugging output in p-adics with print mode "digits"

Are there any other output formats which have three dots "..." in them as standard? If so they are not getting doctested as much as they should be! John -- Forwarded message -- From: SAGE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 2008/9/8 Subject: Re: [SAGE] #3102: [with patch, with review, is

[sage-devel] Fwd: [SAGE] #3999: [with patch, needs review] Wrapper class to treat additive groups as multiplicative goups

I'm forwarding this entry from trac#3999 to sage-devel so it gets a wider readership. I certainly agree that the "main" abelian groups implementation in Sage should be based on (additive) Z-modules. Then this wrapper idea would be the way to go to implement multiplcative notation. But that's pr

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Sphinx and the Sage Documentation

Hi John, This is from the guy organizing a lot of the transition of the numpy docs over to Sphinx... -- Forwarded message -- From: Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:00 AM Subject: Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sphinx and the Sage Documentation To: Willi

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Minor documentation error

Hi Harald, What happened to the hg repos? Before you modified the web page, http://sagemath.org/hg pointed to all the hg repos for sage. Now it doesn't anymore. We need to have a www2/hg directory, I think. -- Forwarded message -- From: Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date:

[sage-devel] Fwd: SAGE article in the biggest student magazin at the ETH university

-- Forwarded message -- From: Samuel Gaehwiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:32 AM Subject: SAGE article in the biggest student magazin at the ETH university To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi William, as I promised in the SAGE support mailinglist a couple of weeks ago

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Fwd: SAGE 3.0.1 doc errata, mostly w.r.t. tutorial (doc dated 2007.10.28)

Hi, Here is a response by Johann about the issues he pointed out.He says I ship some very old version of the tutorial in the binary for intel os x 10.4. Indeed, it turns out that that binary just happens to be the *only* binary I distribute that is obtained by doing "sage -upgrade" repeatedly

[sage-devel] Fwd: SAGE 3.0.1 doc errata, mostly w.r.t. tutorial (doc dated 2007.10.28)

Hi Sage-Devel, Can somebody volunteer to make a trac ticket and put all the following fixes into sage? William -- Forwarded message -- From: Johann Tonsing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, May 17, 2008 at 4:17 PM Subject: SAGE 3.0.1 doc errata, mostly w.r.t. tutorial (doc dated 2

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-support] Re: X range (plotting).

-- Forwarded message -- From: William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 2008/5/1 Subject: [sage-support] Re: X range (plotting). To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes. Use the figsize= option, which takes "inches" as input: sage: plot(cos(x),1,2).show(xmin=1,xmax=2, ymin=-0.5,ymax=0.5, figsi

[sage-devel] Fwd: sage-devel "exact" numerical integration

Begin forwarded message: > From: Andrzej Chrzęszczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: March 5, 2008 6:23:53 PM EST > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: sage-devel "exact" numerical integration > > Dear David > Try > > sage: maxima_console() > (%i1) integrate(%e^(-x^2),x,0,0.1); >

[sage-devel] Fwd: [SAGE] #277: Add generic_discrete_logarithm and order computation using Pollard's rho algorithm

For anyone interested in generic discrete logs, as discussed here in February, please take a look at #277. The patch I put there (based on by earlier patch for #2356 which has a positive review so hopefully will make it into 2.10.3) is just a first step, on which I would like some feedback. I al

[sage-devel] Fwd: Sage

Hi Sage-Devel, Here is some more fan mail: -- Forwarded message -- From: Tom Radcliffe <> Date: Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 7:22 PM Subject: Sage To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just a note to say I've just installed Sage and it really looks like it rocks. Longtime Mathematica user (since ju

[sage-devel] Fwd: SAGE for FPGA development

--- Forwarded message --- From: "Blubaugh, David A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: SAGE for FPGA development Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:26:13 -0800 Sir, I was wondering if it was possible to integrate MyHDL into SAGE??? This would hopefully allow for the devel

[sage-devel] Fwd: Sage for Engineering

Robert, Thanks for your suggestions. I've forwarded it to sage-devel. -- Forwarded message -- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Feb 1, 2008 1:56 PM Subject: Sage for Engineering To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello Mr. Stein, Sage is great for mathematics! If it included Physica

[sage-devel] Fwd: Sage download procedure

Hi everyone, I have no idea if this is true, or if it was auto- generated and is spam, or what, but some people here might care. Nick Begin forwarded message: > From: lou blaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: January 22, 2008 7:41:18 AM PST > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Sage download procedu

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-newbie] Re: Sage for MacOS 10.5 (PPC)

On Jan 21, 2008 2:49 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Jan 21, 11:45 pm, boyfarrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Is there a binary download of the PowerPC version of MacOS 10.5 > > Leopard? > > > > If not, it it possible to build from source on a 10.5 PPC system?

[sage-devel] Fwd: SAGE testing?

-- Forwarded message -- From: Werner Krandick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Jan 16, 2008 7:43 AM Subject: SAGE testing? To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dear William, I am currently writing on the testing of computer algebra programs and systems. For this purpose I would like to know how you g

[sage-devel] Fwd: SAGE and SOCR

-- Forwarded message -- From: Ivo Dinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:25:17 -0800 Subject: SAGE and SOCR To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dear Dr. Stein: I came across your SAGE (http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/) developments and visited your booth at the Joi

[sage-devel] Fwd: SAGE in Iran

Hi Sage-Devel, Some of you might find this interesting -- it's an email I just got from a professor in Iran who is very excited about Sage and plans to run a workshop there on Sage soon. Write to him if you have any thoughts. -- William -- Forwarded message -- From: Amir Moha

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-support] Re: Sage 2.9 VMWare image released

-- Forwarded message -- From: Adam Getchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Jan 8, 2008 11:24 AM Subject: Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage 2.9 VMWare image released To: William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I just uploaded vmware-sage-deluxe-2.9.3.7z to my home directory on sage.math. It's slig

[sage-devel] Fwd: Sage Mac application bundle

Hi, Can some Mac user try this code submission from NASA out and make it part of Sage? It looks pretty sweet. -- Forwarded message -- From: Ted Wright <@ NASA> Date: Jan 8, 2008 10:44 AM Subject: Sage Mac application bundle To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, Thanks for Sage - it's aw

[sage-devel] Re: [Jmol-developers] [sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Jmol andMathematics Visualization

On Jan 1, 2008, at 12:28 PM, Bob Hanson wrote: > The zip file business is complete. What you do is, in 11.5.2, > > set defaultdirectory "whateverfile.zip" > > then when you issue > > load myfile.xyz > > or > > script "test.spt" > > those files are drawn from the zip file, just as though it were

[sage-devel] Re: [Jmol-developers] [sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Jmol andMathematics Visualization

The zip file business is complete. What you do is, in 11.5.2, set defaultdirectory "whateverfile.zip" then when you issue load myfile.xyz or script "test.spt" those files are drawn from the zip file, just as though it were a real directory. To go back to normal operation, issue set

[sage-devel] Re: [Jmol-developers] [sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Jmol andMathematics Visualization

Thanks. Looks good to me. Where can I get some jars to play around with this? Any more work on the zip file stuff? - Robert On Dec 31, 2007, at 8:23 PM, Bob Hanson wrote: > Jmol 11.5.1 has > > pmesh binary "filename" > > It's just experimental -- totally up to you what you want there, >

[sage-devel] Re: [Jmol-developers] [sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Jmol andMathematics Visualization

Jmol 11.5.1 has pmesh binary "filename" It's just experimental -- totally up to you what you want there, Robert -- but for now it looks like this: http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/docs/misc/pmesh.bin described here: http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/docs/misc/pmesh.bin.txt seems to work with

[sage-devel] Re: [Jmol-developers] [sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Jmol andMathematics Visualization

On Dec 31, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Bob Hanson wrote: > > Robert Bradshaw wrote: > >> On Dec 30, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Bob Hanson wrote: >> >>> Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>> >> >> Yep, I think this is the way to go. You mentioned curves, arrows, and >> ellipses. What are the commands for curves/arrows? (If t

[sage-devel] Re: [Jmol-developers] [sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Jmol andMathematics Visualization

Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Dec 30, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Bob Hanson wrote: > >> Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> > > Yep, I think this is the way to go. You mentioned curves, arrows, and > ellipses. What are the commands for curves/arrows? (If the > documentation is clear, just point me there...) And

[sage-devel] Re: [Jmol-developers] [sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Jmol andMathematics Visualization

On Dec 30, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Bob Hanson wrote: > Robert Bradshaw wrote: > >> On Dec 29, 2007, at 9:15 PM, Robert Hanson wrote: >> >>> I'm a bit lost on this thread, but I wanted to respond to the >>> binary/multiple file issue. >>> >>> First, it's a fine idea to create a binary Pmesh file format

[sage-devel] Re: [Jmol-developers] [sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Jmol andMathematics Visualization

On Dec 30, 2007, at 10:06 AM, Bob Hanson wrote: > possibly, but let's talk first about what you are really interested in > doing, then talk format. Arrays aren't necessarily the solution. I agree here. > Pmesh > is not what you want for simple planes and objects -- that is for > complex mathema

[sage-devel] Re: [Jmol-developers] [sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Jmol andMathematics Visualization

On Dec 30, 2007 11:06 AM, Bob Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > possibly, but let's talk first about what you are really interested in > doing, then talk format. Arrays aren't necessarily the solution. Pmesh > is not what you want for simple planes and objects -- that is for > complex mathematic

[sage-devel] Re: [Jmol-developers] [sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Jmol andMathematics Visualization

Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Dec 29, 2007, at 9:15 PM, Robert Hanson wrote: > >> I'm a bit lost on this thread, but I wanted to respond to the >> binary/multiple file issue. >> >> First, it's a fine idea to create a binary Pmesh file format. If we do >> that, though, let's not rush into it and jus

[sage-devel] Re: [Jmol-developers] [sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Jmol andMathematics Visualization

possibly, but let's talk first about what you are really interested in doing, then talk format. Arrays aren't necessarily the solution. Pmesh is not what you want for simple planes and objects -- that is for complex mathematical descriptions of surfaces. Using specific colorings and shadings

[sage-devel] Re: [Jmol-developers] [sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Jmol andMathematics Visualization

Howdy, On Dec 29, 2007 10:59 PM, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 29, 2007, at 9:15 PM, Robert Hanson wrote: > > > I'm a bit lost on this thread, but I wanted to respond to the > > binary/multiple file issue. > > > > First, it's a fine idea to create a binary Pmesh file forma

[sage-devel] Re: [Jmol-developers] [sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Jmol andMathematics Visualization

On Dec 29, 2007, at 9:15 PM, Robert Hanson wrote: > I'm a bit lost on this thread, but I wanted to respond to the > binary/multiple file issue. > > First, it's a fine idea to create a binary Pmesh file format. If we do > that, though, let's not rush into it and just "create a binary > equivalen

[sage-devel] Re: [Jmol-developers] [sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Jmol andMathematics Visualization

I'm a bit lost on this thread, but I wanted to respond to the binary/multiple file issue. First, it's a fine idea to create a binary Pmesh file format. If we do that, though, let's not rush into it and just "create a binary equivalent of a Pmesh file." If this is really useful, then let's create

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-newbie] Integer points on Elliptic Curves

- William (Sent from my iPhone.) Begin forwarded message: > From: bill purvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: December 17, 2007 3:05:25 PM MST > To: sage-newbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [sage-newbie] Integer points on Elliptic Curves > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Anyone have any usefu

[sage-devel] Fwd: sage

-- Forwarded message -- From: Mario Natiello < Date: Dec 14, 2007 1:38 AM Subject: sage To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hallo, > If you happen to have just read straight through > this tutorial, and have some sense of how long > it took you, please let me know Hi. I browsed the tutorial i

[sage-devel] Fwd: SAGE

-- Forwarded message -- From: Selim Tuncel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Dec 11, 2007 10:37 AM Subject: SAGE To: William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> William, The story about SAGE is now on the UW main page: http://www.washington.edu/ Selim -- William Stein Associate Professor of

  1   2   >