Re: [sage-devel] Fwd: building on t2 in 4 hours

2010-06-11 Thread David Kirkby
On 11 June 2010 07:00, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Jun 9, 2010, at 4:36 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > >> I think this is such good news, that even those on sage-devel will not >> mind too much! Building packages in parallel seems to be working very well. >> That said, wtih 128 hardware threads, st

Re: [sage-devel] Fwd: building on t2 in 4 hours

2010-06-10 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Jun 9, 2010, at 4:36 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: I think this is such good news, that even those on sage-devel will not mind too much! Building packages in parallel seems to be working very well. That said, wtih 128 hardware threads, still only a small fraction of 't2' is being used effe

[sage-devel] Fwd: building on t2 in 4 hours

2010-06-09 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
I think this is such good news, that even those on sage-devel will not mind too much! Building packages in parallel seems to be working very well. That said, wtih 128 hardware threads, still only a small fraction of 't2' is being used effectively. I've found with multi-threaded coded, around 500