Le vendredi 09 oct. 2015 à 09:43:31 (-0700), Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
>
> On Friday, 9 October 2015 09:26:48 UTC-7, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> >
> > > we talk about nauty being included into Sage - the permission is being
> > given
> > > for this, and only this, AFAIU...
> >
> > I don't think that "
On Friday, 9 October 2015 09:26:48 UTC-7, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> > we talk about nauty being included into Sage - the permission is being
> given
> > for this, and only this, AFAIU...
>
> I don't think that " + must only be used in Sage" is
> GPL-compatible.
>
As long we we do not write t
> we talk about nauty being included into Sage - the permission is being given
> for this, and only this, AFAIU...
I don't think that " + must only be used in Sage" is GPL-compatible.
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To un
On Friday, 9 October 2015 09:12:51 UTC-7, Snark wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Le vendredi 09 oct. 2015 ą 07:30:06 (-0700), Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
> > On Thursday, 8 October 2015 11:46:34 UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2015-10-08 20:22, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > > > if it talks about chan
Hi,
Le vendredi 09 oct. 2015 ą 07:30:06 (-0700), Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
> On Thursday, 8 October 2015 11:46:34 UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> >
> > On 2015-10-08 20:22, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > > if it talks about changes, this means changes are allowed, no?
> > Well, in principle I agree, bu
On Thursday, 8 October 2015 11:46:34 UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2015-10-08 20:22, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > if it talks about changes, this means changes are allowed, no?
> Well, in principle I agree, but it's safer not to assume anything.
>
Brendan replied that remaining two clauses i
On 2015-10-08 20:22, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
if it talks about changes, this means changes are allowed, no?
Well, in principle I agree, but it's safer not to assume anything.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this
On Thursday, 8 October 2015 10:22:45 UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2015-10-08 19:06, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > ok, so we can make nauty standard package!
>
> Not so fast. The copyright statement is still far from being
> GPL-compatible.
>
> First of all, this restriction is certainly agai
On 2015-10-08 19:06, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
ok, so we can make nauty standard package!
Not so fast. The copyright statement is still far from being GPL-compatible.
First of all, this restriction is certainly against the GPL: "you must
document any changes that you make to this program"
Secon
The other part of the copyright notice says "you must document any
changes". That's presumably GPL incompatible too though it is very
vague
On Thursday, October 8, 2015, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> ok, so we can make nauty standard package!
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "Dim
ok, so we can make nauty standard package!
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Dima Pasechnik"
Date: 8 Oct 2015 10:05 am
Subject: Fwd: Re: nauty in Sage (was: Code generating finite posets of
given size (fwd))
To: "Dima Pasechnik"
Cc:
From: Brendan McKay
Date: 7 Oct 2015 11:48 pm
Su
11 matches
Mail list logo
