On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Robert Bradshaw <
rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote:
> I full heartedly agree with the idea that permutation groups should be able
> to act on more than just the set 1..n, using a dictionary to do the mapping
> transparently to the user under the hood (and this
I full heartedly agree with the idea that permutation groups should be
able to act on more than just the set 1..n, using a dictionary to do
the mapping transparently to the user under the hood (and this is
technically totally feasible). I'm not as convinced that we should
throw out the noti
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jason B Hill
Date: Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:05 PM
Subject: [sage-combinat-devel] permutation group perspectives
To: sage-combinat-de...@googlegroups.com
This comes after a discussion I had with several at Sage days 20.5 in
Toronto relating to the unde
