Re: [sage-devel] Explanations about recent LP patches for Graph Theory

2010-03-04 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Nathann, On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote: > Actually, I wouldn't know where to write them. Some of it already > appears along the code as comments, but I wouldn't know where to write > all this. Were you thinking about copying it inside the function's > documentation ?

Re: [sage-devel] Explanations about recent LP patches for Graph Theory

2010-03-04 Thread Nathann Cohen
Hello ! > I strongly encourage you to include that documentation in the graph > theory module of Sage. That is, if it's not in there already. Things > can and will get buried in the huge mailing list archive of > sage-devel. Actually, I wouldn't know where to write them. Some of it already appear

Re: [sage-devel] Explanations about recent LP patches for Graph Theory

2010-03-04 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Nathann, On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote: > The result is this pdf file, which I > hope will be helpful to those who will be brave enough to review the > corresponding patches :-) > > http://www-sop.inria.fr/members/Nathann.Cohen/LP_formulations.pdf I strongly encourage

[sage-devel] Explanations about recent LP patches for Graph Theory

2010-03-04 Thread Nathann Cohen
Hello everybody Because of a recent patch #8404 which should soon enable Sage to test whether a graph G contains H as a minor, I was asked to provide with these patches an explanation of how they are built. Well, as the same technique is used over and over, it was not too hard to explain othe