Re: [sage-devel] Dependence of libgd on iconv

2019-05-13 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 5:43 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On 5/13/19 10:04 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > We should get an spkg-configure.m4 for libgd, it's really silly to > > build it everywhere... > > (I guess that's what Michael is working on :-)) > > > > I looked at libgd and saw that we

Re: [sage-devel] Dependence of libgd on iconv

2019-05-13 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 4:43 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On 5/13/19 10:04 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > We should get an spkg-configure.m4 for libgd, it's really silly to > > build it everywhere... > > (I guess that's what Michael is working on :-)) > > > > I looked at libgd and saw that we

Re: [sage-devel] Dependence of libgd on iconv

2019-05-13 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 5/13/19 10:04 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > We should get an spkg-configure.m4 for libgd, it's really silly to > build it everywhere... > (I guess that's what Michael is working on :-)) > I looked at libgd and saw that we have in-progress tickets for its other two dependencies, freetype and li

Re: [sage-devel] Dependence of libgd on iconv

2019-05-13 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 3:53 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > iconv is only installed on Cygwin anyway (apart from surely dead HP > port, and fallen behind Solaris port, > which probably no longer needs it anyway). > So this is a red herring one way or another. Wow, I haven't worried too much about i

Re: [sage-devel] Dependence of libgd on iconv

2019-05-13 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2019-05-13 16:04, Dima Pasechnik wrote: as Debian does not have iconv in libgd, I assume it's safe to remove the dependence. If that's possible, sure. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop re

Re: [sage-devel] Dependence of libgd on iconv

2019-05-13 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 2:53 PM Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2019-05-13 15:51, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > It's possible to build libgd without iconv as > > far as I can tell (check CMakeLists.txt) > > A dependency is not the same as a requirement. If it's used by the > package (optional or not),

Re: [sage-devel] Dependence of libgd on iconv

2019-05-13 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2019-05-13 15:51, Michael Orlitzky wrote: It's possible to build libgd without iconv as far as I can tell (check CMakeLists.txt) A dependency is not the same as a requirement. If it's used by the package (optional or not), it's almost certainly a dependency. -- You received this message b

Re: [sage-devel] Dependence of libgd on iconv

2019-05-13 Thread Dima Pasechnik
iconv is only installed on Cygwin anyway (apart from surely dead HP port, and fallen behind Solaris port, which probably no longer needs it anyway). So this is a red herring one way or another. On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 2:51 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > Our libgd package depends on iconv: > > $

[sage-devel] Dependence of libgd on iconv

2019-05-13 Thread Michael Orlitzky
Our libgd package depends on iconv: $ cat build/pkgs/libgd/dependencies libpng freetype iconv ... Does anyone remember why? It's possible to build libgd without iconv as far as I can tell (check CMakeLists.txt), and the only consequence I see is that some functions in libgd's src/gdkanji.c