Hi,
thanks for the hint.
i looked into it (shortly), this seems the way to go,
but again my question is:
is there interest in it?
I could/would rewrite it using this infrastructure, but only if there
are people interested in it...
thanks
Maximilian
>
> You should use the infrastructure (written
Hi Maximillian,
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:27:45 +0100
Maximilian Trescher wrote:
> I'm very new to the developers list.
> About my background: I'm studying physics (in Berlin) and I'm using
> sage regularly for some physical calculations.
>
> Three days ago I wondered if there is any possibility t
Hi @all,
I'm very new to the developers list.
About my background: I'm studying physics (in Berlin) and I'm using sage
regularly for some physical calculations.
Three days ago I wondered if there is any possibility to create a
"numpy-enabled" function from a sage's symbolic expression. But i
coul
