On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:10:55 +0100
Charles Bouillaguet wrote:
> > I am not suggesting to patch the Sage library when installing your
> > package. You can put the interface in a separate Cython module
> > which is built by the usual Python/Cython setup.py magic and
> > installed in the system pyth
Hi Martin,
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:15:51 +0100
Martin Albrecht wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be easier to include the Cython interface in the
> > package? AFAIK, Cython's build system improved significantly and
> > there is no reason to use Sage's build system for a Cython module.
>
> my understanding
On 2012-12-20 14:10, Charles Bouillaguet wrote:
> Again, what should I do :) ?
The question is really: what to do with *documentation* of
optional/experimental packages, should it be amongst the Sage
documentation? If YES, then indeed all doctests need to be marked optional.
--
You received this
> I am not suggesting to patch the Sage library when installing your
> package. You can put the interface in a separate Cython module which is
> built by the usual Python/Cython setup.py magic and installed in the
> system python module directory. Then people will be able to import your
> module fr
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:15:38 +0100
Charles Bouillaguet wrote:
> On 12/20/2012 01:02 PM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> >> What should I do ? Unconditionally include the cython interface to
> >> the sage library, and mark all doctests as optional ?
> >
> > Can you compile the Cython interface without the
> Wouldn't it be easier to include the Cython interface in the package?
> AFAIK, Cython's build system improved significantly and there is no
> reason to use Sage's build system for a Cython module.
Hi Burcin,
my understanding is that Charles was more specifically asking about including
his expe
On 12/20/2012 01:02 PM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
What should I do ? Unconditionally include the cython interface to
the sage library, and mark all doctests as optional ?
Can you compile the Cython interface without the header files installed
by your package?
No
I assume the Cython interface nee
Hi Charles,
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:37:33 +0100
Charles Bouillaguet wrote:
> I (amongst with others) have written a library that solves boolean
> equations in some way. I wanted to include it as an experimental
> spkg. I thus wrote a cython interface to Sage. To be usable from
> inside Sage, bot
Hi all,
I (amongst with others) have written a library that solves boolean
equations in some way. I wanted to include it as an experimental spkg. I
thus wrote a cython interface to Sage. To be usable from inside Sage,
both the library itself and the cython interface are necessary. What is
the
