Vincent wrote:
> Sorry to disturb. This discussion should go to the relevant ticket...
>
You are right. I have now voiced my concerns there:
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17480
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe fro
Hello,
Sorry to disturb. This discussion should go to the relevant ticket...
Vincent
2014-12-17 12:08 UTC+01:00, Samuel Lelièvre :
> More thoughts.
>
> 0. It's good that you are refreshing this part of the documentation,
> if only to update references to Pyrex to references to Cython!
>
> 1. May
More thoughts.
0. It's good that you are refreshing this part of the documentation,
if only to update references to Pyrex to references to Cython!
1. Maybe it would be worth pointing to the subtle ways in which these
functions differ in names and in nature:
There are three relevant functions
Am 2014-12-17 um 10:47 schrieb Samuel Lelievre:
> Hello! Your rewording mentions "four relevant functions"
> but I can only see three listed.
thank you, I forgot to change that after unifying two descriptions.
Fixed (http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17480 ).
> Also, there is a typo: "DD NOT" for
Clemens Heuberger wrote:
>
> Am 2014-12-15 um 12:00 schrieb David Roe:
> > The difference is in how cpdef functions interact with Cython vs Python
> > classes. If you want to override a cpdef method in a *Python* subclass
> then you
> > must use def (of course). But in a *Cython* subclass, yo
Am 2014-12-15 um 12:00 schrieb David Roe:
> The difference is in how cpdef functions interact with Cython vs Python
> classes. If you want to override a cpdef method in a *Python* subclass then
> you
> must use def (of course). But in a *Cython* subclass, you must use cpdef. If
> you accidental
The difference is in how cpdef functions interact with Cython vs Python
classes. If you want to override a cpdef method in a *Python* subclass
then you must use def (of course). But in a *Cython* subclass, you must
use cpdef. If you accidentally use def instead in a Cython class then it
doesn't
In
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/structure/sage/structure/element.html#how-to-define-a-new-element-class
,
I find the descriptions of _add_ very confusing, because it seems to imply that
there are two versions of _add_, one of them as a "def" and the other as a
"cpdef". As it stands, it
