On 29 November 2010 14:27, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2010-11-29 13:59, David Kirkby wrote:
>> The addition of the buildbot to Sage should be a good thing. But it
>> seems to get very little use.
> Let me answer this from a release manager point-of-view.
>
> Currently, the buildbot is essentially
On 2010-11-29 13:59, David Kirkby wrote:
> The addition of the buildbot to Sage should be a good thing. But it
> seems to get very little use. I know the Wireshark projects runs their
> buildbots 24/7. Any failures are emailed to the developers, along with
> a list of who has committed source since
The addition of the buildbot to Sage should be a good thing. But it
seems to get very little use. I know the Wireshark projects runs their
buildbots 24/7. Any failures are emailed to the developers, along with
a list of who has committed source since the last successful build. I
appreciate that its
