On 30 May 2018 at 08:10, Erik Bray wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 9:13 PM, John Cremona
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 25 May 2018 at 18:47, kcrisman wrote:
> >>
> >> Less relevant, but still ... Also probably behind a paywall ... anyway,
> >> this is a review of Barry Mazur and William Stein's book
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 9:13 PM, John Cremona wrote:
>
>
> On 25 May 2018 at 18:47, kcrisman wrote:
>>
>> Less relevant, but still ... Also probably behind a paywall ... anyway,
>> this is a review of Barry Mazur and William Stein's book on the Riemann
>> Hypothesis by someone who knows something
On Sat, 26 May 2018, 15:20 kcrisman, wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, May 25, 2018 at 3:13:57 PM UTC-4, John Cremona wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 25 May 2018 at 18:47, kcrisman wrote:
>>
>>> Less relevant, but still ... Also probably behind a paywall ... anyway,
>>> this is a review of Barry Mazur and William S
On Friday, May 25, 2018 at 3:13:57 PM UTC-4, John Cremona wrote:
>
>
>
> On 25 May 2018 at 18:47, kcrisman > wrote:
>
>> Less relevant, but still ... Also probably behind a paywall ... anyway,
>> this is a review of Barry Mazur and William Stein's book on the Riemann
>> Hypothesis by someone wh
On 25 May 2018 at 18:47, kcrisman wrote:
> Less relevant, but still ... Also probably behind a paywall ... anyway,
> this is a review of Barry Mazur and William Stein's book on the Riemann
> Hypothesis by someone who knows something about writing good books about
> analytic number theory and repr
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:47 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> Less relevant, but still ... Also probably behind a paywall ... anyway, this
> is a review of Barry Mazur and William Stein's book on the Riemann
> Hypothesis by someone who knows something about writing good books about
> analytic number theory
Less relevant, but still ... Also probably behind a paywall ... anyway,
this is a review of Barry Mazur and William Stein's book on the Riemann
Hypothesis by someone who knows something about writing good books about
analytic number theory and representation theory. No Sage in the review
but s
