Re: [sage-devel] Better tracebacks (#71)

2014-11-21 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
Let me also mention that I have no plans to change anything regarding the "inspect" module, this is only about displaying tracebacks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it

Re: [sage-devel] Better tracebacks (#71)

2014-11-20 Thread David Roe
I don't see any big problems with the overall approach at first glance. And the result is great! David On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > Hello, > > I have a working proof-of-concept to improve tracebacks for preparsed code > and for Cython code. On http://trac.sagemath.or

[sage-devel] Better tracebacks (#71)

2014-11-20 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
Hello, I have a working proof-of-concept to improve tracebacks for preparsed code and for Cython code. On http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/71, you can see an example of a new traceback. This isn't a finished patch yet, but I would like some opinions on the general approach first. The main