On Wednesday, 6 January 2016 20:53:37 UTC, vdelecroix wrote:
>
> Indeed, wouldn't it possible to make it as follows
>
> sage: G0 = libgap.SO(3,4)
> sage: so = libgap.GeneratorsOfGroup(G0)
> etc
>
of course it would. But what's the point of having all these intermediate
libgap objects being
Indeed, wouldn't it possible to make it as follows
sage: G0 = libgap.SO(3,4)
sage: so = libgap.GeneratorsOfGroup(G0)
etc
Vincent
On 06/01/16 17:48, Nathann Cohen wrote:
Hello everybody,
A ticket is in needs_review at #19661 [1], and the branch's main
feature is a new graph constructor. I writ
Hello everybody,
A ticket is in needs_review at #19661 [1], and the branch's main
feature is a new graph constructor. I write here because of a
disagreement Dima and I have about the code: I do not like at all that
most of the code is a *string* that is sent to GAP for evaluation.
http://git
