Without knowing Lisp it is hard for me to really tell how valid your
arguments are, but I must admit a couple of people who know both Lisp
and Python have said Lisp would be easier. You are RJF are not the
only ones to express that opinion.
Dave
Consider the MMA code as a source language
On 09/ 6/10 01:39 AM, Tim Daly wrote:
David Kirkby wrote:
On 5 September 2010 22:13, William Stein wrote:
On Sunday, September 5, 2010, David Kirkby
wrote:
RJF thinks Lisp is the best language
William thinks Python is God
No I don't.
I chose Python for Sage because in 2004 it was the c
David Kirkby wrote:
On 5 September 2010 22:13, William Stein wrote:
On Sunday, September 5, 2010, David Kirkby wrote:
RJF thinks Lisp is the best language
William thinks Python is God
No I don't.
I chose Python for Sage because in 2004 it was the closest popular
open s
On 5 September 2010 22:13, William Stein wrote:
> On Sunday, September 5, 2010, David Kirkby wrote:
>> RJF thinks Lisp is the best language
>> William thinks Python is God
>
> No I don't.
>
> I chose Python for Sage because in 2004 it was the closest popular
> open source language to Magma.
God
On Sunday, September 5, 2010, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 5 September 2010 17:51, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:55 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>>> Has anyone given thought for making Sage read Mathematica syntax? I've
>>
>> Yes:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_
On 5 September 2010 17:51, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:55 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>> Has anyone given thought for making Sage read Mathematica syntax? I've
>
> Yes:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/d9824f455407ee23
>
> Ondrej
Thank you.
What
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:55 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
> Has anyone given thought for making Sage read Mathematica syntax? I've
Yes:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/d9824f455407ee23
Ondrej
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To un
Has anyone given thought for making Sage read Mathematica syntax? I've
seen a recent video from William stating it is NOT an aim of Sage to
be clone of any of the 4 M's - in contrast, Octave is a clone of
MATLAB.
Whilst parsing Mathematica code is not an aim of Sage, I doubt many
would are argue t
