Re: [sage-devel] 90% doctest coverage thrust

2011-11-15 Thread William Stein
On 11/14/11 1:13 PM, Tom Boothby wrote: I'll doctest polynomial_compiled this week, since it's 100% my fault. Thanks. I just doctested interpolation.pyx, which uses GSL's for splines. It was very straightforward. Please review it at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12036 In

Re: [sage-devel] 90% doctest coverage thrust

2011-11-14 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Tom Boothby wrote: > I'll doctest polynomial_compiled this week, since it's 100% my fault. Excellent. I've made a ticket for you at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12033 and added a link from http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12024 I t

Re: [sage-devel] 90% doctest coverage thrust

2011-11-14 Thread Tom Boothby
I'll doctest polynomial_compiled this week, since it's 100% my fault. On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:41 PM, William Stein wrote: > Hi Sage Developers, > After deleting the server directory we need to add doctests to > about588 more functions to get coverage to 90%, which is a major goal > forsage-5.0

[sage-devel] 90% doctest coverage thrust

2011-11-13 Thread William Stein
Hi Sage Developers, After deleting the server directory we need to add doctests to about588 more functions to get coverage to 90%, which is a major goal forsage-5.0, which we've been working on getting to for over a year now.I did an audit and came up with about 350 functions in 18 files forwhich a