On Aug 17, 8:31 pm, "Michael Abshoff"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [This is CC to the google group sage-devel]
>
> Hello clisp folks,
>
> the Sage people are currently trying to make Sage run on Solaris in 32 bit
> mode. That involves a working clisp to make Maxima work.
>
> We compile clisp wit
First of all, I'm "just a user" -- a working programmer/applied
mathematician (45 years and counting.) I've been doing this since
*before* ScratchPad. Perhaps some of you have heard of FORMAC? I was
working at IBM in Poughkeepsie, NY, when Jean Sammet and her
colleagues
released it! And I was ther
Has anyone considered adding Yacas to Sage? They just released version
1.1.0, and have an ambitious road map that seems at least
philosophically compatible with Sage. See
http://yacas.sf.net/
and
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=F0A91E14-1B68-435F-93A9-313ECF8400AF%40xs4
The build is complete. I actually ended up doing it in two passes. The
first pass was a simple "make -j" which took about 18 minutes:
real18m8.232s
user26m41.442s
sys 6m41.761s
This is a 2P. Interestingly enough, the load average got up into the
60s at one point, but the system never
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Creative Commons creates a legal equivalent of public domain where it doesn't
> already exist. At that point, Microsoft can use it, improve / harm it in any
> way they like, take all the credit, and turn a profit. It's essentially a
> license to relicense it under y
On Jul 29, 12:19 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Technically speaking, all of my systems run "testing" level Gentoo, so
> > this sort of thing is to be expected. I can easily drop back to a
> > stable GCC any time I want to, or for that matter, just force a 4.1.2
> > compile for
While I think the goals of the FSF in general and the various
and sundry versions of the GPL in particular are in many senses noble,
I *bitterly* resent the complexity of the GPL, especially version 3.
The implication of that complexity is that a programmer who wishes to
develop free software must
On Jul 28, 10:16 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately linbox won't build yet with GCC >= 4.2.0. The linbox
> developers
> are painfully aware of this, and it's evidently a nontrivial problem for them
> to
> fix. SAGE-2.7.2 (which I just uploaded moments ago) will buil
