On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> > Kamaraju,
> >
> > Overall I like your plan. And I'd like to help.
> >
> > I do not like starting with version 3.0.6. I think such an old version
> > is unlikely to attract many users and hence testing will be suboptimal.
> > In addition, upstrea
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> > Removing the package from unstable doesn't prevent you from working on
> > the package. It's just a way to clean up Debian. It will be very easy to
> > re-upload when you will have something that builds in i386 and amd64
> > (though it might be be
Okay, I will not bother submitting the flintqs package to Debian,
since it sounds like things may move to flint entirely before the SAGE
package makes it into Debian upstream anyway.
-Tim Abbott
On May 8, 10:02 am, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The new quadratic sieve included
On May 8, 5:46 am, Clement Pernet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rumors are always true!
> I meant to merge linbox_wrap in linbox/interfaces for the 2.0 linbox
> release. Depending on how urgent is your need for this to happen, I may
> consider doing it in a 1.1.6 release instead.
What's the times
It turns out the singular problem was that /usr/lib/libsingular.so has
to be marked as executable for Singular to load it.
The LinBox problem went away when I upgraded to 3.0.1alpha1.
-Tim Abbott
On Apr 26, 9:28 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2:57 am, T
On May 2, 7:31 pm, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got it! -IGMPRATIONAL should be -DGMPRATIONAL
> Do not know where that came from in your package.
>
> Francois
Indeed; that was a typo in my package introduced when I fixed a
different bug. It would have probably taken me a long time to
