[sage-devel] Build Error for 7.3 beta 3 on Mac OS X 10.11.5

You need to perform an explicit installation of the Xcode command line tools. I had the same error recently and that solved it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 7.3.beta3 build failure on OS X versions 10.8 and 10.9.

I can confirm Sage 7.3.beta3 builds on OS X 10.11 (El Capitan) On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 6:47:29 PM UTC-7, Nathan Dunfield wrote: > > On OS X versions 10.8 (Mountain Lion) and 10.9 (Mavricks), the recently > updated NTL package fails to build with the following error (complete log > also attach

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

Andrey, any idea when my embedded interacts will start working again? Thanks. On Monday, May 23, 2016 at 9:28:35 PM UTC-7, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > > On Sunday, 22 May 2016 15:27:26 UTC-6, paulmasson wrote: >> >> Still getting the problem. Occurs on about half of pa

[sage-devel] Re: Sage apps for iOS and Android

If it helps to know, the Sage app is working fine for me on both my iPhone and iPad. Some cells don't display nicely until the "Evaluate" button is tapped, but otherwise everything appears to function. Perhaps the reported error had to do with changes being made last week on the server. Not see

[sage-devel] Re: Integration of Trac and Github

If you search the Trac database for users github/matsen and github/switzel and compare the results with open pull requests, the integration appears to have stopped working in the middle of 2015. On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 at 6:43:28 PM UTC-7, kcrisman wrote: > > > The developer's walkthrough >>

[sage-devel] Integration of Trac and Github

The developer's walkthrough says in its third paragraph: You can alternatively fork and create a pull request at github which will automatically fetch your code and open a ticket on our trac server.

[sage-devel] Re: Piecewise functions in Sage 7.2

c functions in some way? Maybe define a numerical_piecewise function? On Sunday, May 22, 2016 at 4:42:55 PM UTC-7, paulmasson wrote: > > Automatic creation of a symbolic function from a numeric one sounds like a > good idea to me, if feasible. I'm coming to Sage from Mathematica, wher

[sage-devel] Re: Piecewise functions in Sage 7.2

g(x) raises an exception, > though there might be further implication... > > > > On Sunday, May 22, 2016 at 1:38:06 AM UTC+2, paulmasson wrote: >> >> Another problem I've encountered concerns including numerical integrals >> in piecewise functions. This used t

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

f the links on this page lead to existing pages yet. On Sunday, May 22, 2016 at 1:52:04 PM UTC-7, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > > On Sunday, 22 May 2016 14:01:26 UTC-6, paulmasson wrote: >> >> Andrey, I have a bunch of simple interacts in Github pages of this sort >> >> @

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

Not a bug in Sage 7.2, just lots of new behavior for piecewise. On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 2:42:06 PM UTC-7, paulmasson wrote: > > Andrey, I've confirmed that the error comes from the piecewise function > and not the interacts. Looks like a bug in Sage 7.2, not in the test server.

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

Andrey, I have a bunch of simple interacts in Github pages of this sort @interact def _( n=slider(0,10,step_size=1) ): show( plot( bessel_J(n,x), x, 0, n+20, figsize=[4,2], color=(0,.5,1) ) ) that randomly fail to interact. The server returns an initial image but the interact doesn't functi

[sage-devel] Re: Piecewise functions in Sage 7.2

Another problem I've encountered concerns including numerical integrals in piecewise functions. This used to work in Sage 6.9: def g(x): var('u') return numerical_integral(u^2,0,x)[0] f=piecewise([ [(0,1), g ] ]) but now gives the error message

Re: [sage-devel] Piecewise functions in Sage 7.2

Thanks for clearing that up. This is definitely new behavior. On Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 3:58:27 PM UTC-7, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On 05/21/2016 06:06 PM, paulmasson wrote: > > Since the SageMathCell server has been updated to Sage 7.2, I've been > > experiencin

[sage-devel] Piecewise functions in Sage 7.2

Since the SageMathCell server has been updated to Sage 7.2, I've been experiencing issues with piecewise functions. For example, define a simple saw tooth with f=piecewise([[(0,1),x],[(1,3),2-x],[(3,4),x-4]]) The endpoints appear to be defined just fine, f.end_points() [0, 1, 3, 4] but if I

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

Andrey, I've confirmed that the error comes from the piecewise function and not the interacts. Looks like a bug in Sage 7.2, not in the test server. On Monday, May 16, 2016 at 8:50:21 PM UTC-7, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > > On Sunday, 15 May 2016 19:29:56 UTC-6, paulm

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

day, May 15, 2016 at 5:41:05 PM UTC-7, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > > On Sunday, 15 May 2016 17:18:37 UTC-6, paulmasson wrote: >> >> I just tested a page with several embedded plots and three numerical WKB >> calculations. The plots work fine but the WKB calculations pr

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

I just tested a page with several embedded plots and three numerical WKB calculations. The plots work fine but the WKB calculations produce the error message: TypeError: unable to simplify to float approximation This error does not occur for the servers at cosmos.mat.uam.es or sagecell.sagemat

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

I just tested a page with several embedded plots and three numerical WKB calculations. The plots work fine but the WKB calculations produce the error message: TypeError: unable to simplify to float approximation This error does not occur for the servers at cosmos.mat.uam.es or sagecell.sagemat

Re: [sage-notebook] Re: [sage-devel] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

can see last commits are quite small apart from splitting a file, so > hopefully I won't cause much more trouble and thank your for testing! > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 8:18 PM, paulmasson > wrote: > > Andrey, the test server is not completing evaluations. Just get the > spin

Re: [sage-notebook] Re: [sage-devel] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

Andrey, the test server is not completing evaluations. Just get the spinning GIF. Also, I'm curious as to why you're making modifications in the master branch of the sagecell repository. I happened to be reading the JavaScript source code right when you split it into smaller files yesterday, an

[sage-devel] Does any repository at github.com/sagemath accept Github pull requests?

The sagecell repository accepts pull requests. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, sen

Re: [sage-devel] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

Testing a page with eight embedded cells in Firefox 45.0.2 / Windows 10. Assuming that tags should be updated to