before, I don't know who is into
knots and braid stuff, hence I ask here...)
Cheers
Moritz
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an emai
The licensing issue also makes installing more cumbersome, since you are
supposed to open a browser and click around.
This could possibly be improved by
displaying the licensing information given and linked and the page
scip.zib.de/download.php?fname=scipoptsuite-5.0.1.tgz directly in the
ter
Just a clarification regarding the licences:
PySCIPOpt actually is under a MIT licences.
https://github.com/SCIP-Interfaces/PySCIPOpt/blob/master/LICENSE
"Only" SCIP (and scipoptsuite) is under this academic license that is
criticized in the replies below.
--
You received this message because
tten a backend, see #21003,
<https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21003> which is based on #24662.
<https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24662>
It would be great if some people could test it and possibly review it!
Cheers
Moritz
<https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21003>
--
You received
thanks for the quick fix, Robert! This is know the behavior I would have
expected!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googleg
for the parent of a RealNumber
is determined. I guess the line mpfr_init2(self.value, p.__prec)
in real_mpfr.pyx initializes mpfr and later mpfr_set_str(self.value, s,
base, parent.rnd) is called. But where in the process is the precision of
the parent "p" defined?
Cheers,
Moritz
When trying to build sage from source on my debian box with a current sid
install, I get the following error:
[singular-4.1.0p1] ../../../gfanlib/gfanlib_matrix.h:221:24: warning:
comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
[singular-4.1.0p1] Makefile:573: recipe
I figured out what the problem was: I had a version of polymake installed
(3.0.6) and singular checks for a polymake install. However when I removed
polymake and polymake-config from /usr/local/bin sage could be build
successfully. When configuring singular one could also pass the
--disable-pol
[I tried to post already yesterday, but my message somehow didn't get
through]
When trying to build sage (the current develop-branch 7.5) I get an error
on my debian box with a current sid-install.
For the end of the logfile, see the end of this post. It also throws some
of the following erro
On Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 9:44:09 PM UTC+1, François wrote:
>
> Don't think so. Look at the logs at the messages about Sed during
> configure.
> Sed is used to preprocess that file.
> Gentoo report
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604764
> I think Bill will have to look at it upst
Was there a way to fix it? I googled for it, but didn't find the report in
Gentoo.
Is anybody else compiling sage or mpir successfully on a current debian-sid
distribution?
On Monday, January 9, 2017 at 7:52:45 PM UTC+1, François wrote:
>
> I have seen a report for this in Gentoo
> Against 2.6
g else that might be useful to
solve this problem.
Moritz
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
T
Thanks for the encouraging replies!
I opened a ticket:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13517
moritz
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
To u
t neighbor
- a plotting routine in 2d and 3d
I am new to sage, but I want to start contributing.
Whats the best way to proceed?
Is there anyone interested in having such a feature?
Should I open a trac ticket?
Any suggestions are welcome.
moritz
--
You received this message because you
Excuse my slow response (my android phone is not my regular phone and
I didn't have it with me for a couple of days).
> That's actually different than what they are describing, and seems to
> have to do with Codemirror or how the browser is interacting (or our
> code for dealing with CodeMirror).
Same problems here (Samsung Galaxy Mini, 2.3.5). I can connect to
aleph.sagemath.org on my phone, but 1+1 throws a syntax error
depending on whether I toggle plaintext input or not.
On Jan 24, 8:03 pm, Aaron Dutle wrote:
> I've got the same problems on my Droid X2, running 2.3.3. I can access
> a
+1
On Nov 22, 9:00 am, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:36 PM, William Stein wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:50 PM, David Roe wrote:
> >> The coercion graph in Sage is supposed to be transitive. This
> >> assumption is explicit in the documentation of sage.structure.coe
Hi Syd,
I'm also quite interested in an implementation of Hess' algorithm in
Sage. If you keep me posted and break the task down into small
patches, I'd love to help!
On Nov 17, 4:43 am, "syd.lavas...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> Sorry, for the spam threat. I just wanted to target somebody on the
> ticke
> Given f in R[x,y], I think f(x=a, y=b) should do exactly the same
> thing as f(a,b). The parent should be the same as R.base_ring()(0) + a
> + b.
+1
> The difficult case is what to do for f(x=5). Should that be the same
> as f(x=5, y=y) or a univariate polynomial?
I would certainly read f(x=5) a
> Given f in R[x,y], I think f(x=a, y=b) should do exactly the same
> thing as f(a,b). The parent should be the same as R.base_ring()(0) + a
> + b.
+1
> The difficult case is what to do for f(x=5). Should that be the same
> as f(x=5, y=y) or a univariate polynomial?
I would certainly read f(x=5) a
20 matches
Mail list logo
