Hi Niles,
Like John, I would like to be cc'd on any tickets about this. Apart
from the obvious mathematical importance, I'm quite interested in
finding out the right way of implementing these structures. I don't
know if I'll be able to contribute immediately, but I'm looking
forward to seeing ho
Hi all,
This is just a short notice to say that I've uploaded (a while back) a
patch for support of differential forms to Sage, see:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9650
Symbolic computations with tensors etc. have come up a number of times
on this mailing list, so I thought maybe
Hi Simon and Florent,
Let me answer you both in one post, since I think your solutions might
be related. I agree with Simon that this is the offending line:
tester.assert_(isinstance(self,
self.parent().category().element_class))
Now, by adding the line
Element = DifferentialForm
to my p
Hi all,
I am looking for some understanding into the various test routines run
by TestSuite. The problem is that I'm working on a new parent on
which TestSuite fails, and I would like to understand whether this is
due to me not understanding the relevant sage internals (very likely)
or if I can j
Hi guys,
Thanks for the insights. I knew that trying to define the generators
in my original way was asking for trouble, but it's good to learn
why. Right now, I just did the simple thing (which I should have done
from the start):
class DifferentialForms(Algebra):
def __init__(..., coordinat
Dear all,
I would like to follow up on my differential forms class query (http://
groups.google.be/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/
2feef1f0be557585/75173b6c6f52450d) with a question about Sage
programming/invoking style.
If R^n has coordinates x, y, ... (or whatever), then the algebra of
d
On 14 mei, 09:58, jvkersch wrote:
> Meanwhile, I will also collect
> the resources that people have posted in this thread, on a Wiki page
> or so.
See http://wiki.sagemath.org/tensorcalc
Thanks for all the interesting pointers!
All the best,
Joris
--
To post to this group, send
Hi Martin,
On 13 mei, 12:52, Martin Rubey
wrote:
> Waldek just pointed me to a package by Seiler:
>
> http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org/JetBundles
This looks like an interesting package. While I was doing my PhD
thesis I read many of W. Seiler's papers, and I was always intruiged
by the compu
I think my previous reply to this message got eaten, so I'm sending it
again.
On 11 mei, 23:32, William Stein wrote:
> > (...) should
> > I start with a module over the Symbolic Ring, or is another ring more
> > appropriate?
>
> Have you got anywhere reading the Sage developers guide?
>
> http://
On 12 mei, 01:11, Jason Grout wrote:
> > I was wondering if there is any interest in a Sage package to compute
> > with differential forms.
>
> I am interested. I'm particularly interested in applications to
> teaching multivariable calculus.
This raises the interesting possibility (which I
Dear mailing list,
I was wondering if there is any interest in a Sage package to compute
with differential forms. Right now, I have the rudiments of a
differential form class with the obvious operations (wedge product,
exterior differential, Hodge star, ...) but I want to take this
somewhat furth
11 matches
Mail list logo
