Re: [sage-devel] Error running the pipinst script for setuptools-73.0.1.

Hi Leon, sorry for overlooking your previous post. In your config.log you see real_configure:40317: checking whether any of bzip2 liblzma libffi zlib is installed as or will be installed as SPKG real_configure:40322: result: yes; install python3 as well That is, one of system packages providing

Re: [sage-devel] PROPOSAL: remove python3 spkg from Sage

On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 12:36:59PM -0700, Nils Bruin wrote: > On Wednesday, 9 April 2025 at 12:15:07 UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > > >No, this won't fly. This is going to break the already fragile logic > >behind package types. > >Standard packages cannot be optionally installed, so it can't s

Re: [sage-devel] PROPOSAL: remove python3 spkg from Sage

On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 07:37:23PM -0500, Trevor Karn wrote: > What was the original intent behind having the dual requirements of (i) a > system python and (ii) a SPKG python both in Sage? What (once upon a time) > did having a SKPG do that couldn't/shouldn't/wouldn't be done by the system > pytho

Re: [sage-devel] Error Building Sage

On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 10:39:53AM +0530, 'Vishal Shahi 4-Yr B.Tech.: Electronics Engg., IIT(BHU)' via sage-devel wrote: > Even after installing gsl from brew it still shows that gsl will be > installed as no system package detected what to do ? it's detected all right, but it depends on openblas

Re: [sage-devel] does Sage support Grassmannians over finite fields?

On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 06:04:30PM -0400, Jackson Walters wrote: > Thanks, that's helpful. > > G = graphs.GrassmannGraph(5, 4, 2); G > > gives 806 vertices, as expected, but why do the vertices seem to have six > points? > > G.vertices()[0] > {(0, 0, 0, 1), (1, 0, 0, 1), (1, 0, 0, 2), (1, 0, 0,

Re: [sage-devel] How to build sagelib with multiple processes in parallel?

On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 11:57:39AM -0700, Nils Bruin wrote: > In the past I've build sagelib in parallel, with > > export MAKE="make -j8" > make -j8 build > > This seems to still work for the prerequisites, but for building sagelib > everything slows to an agonizing one job at a time. Did someth

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2025 Ideas

On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 09:29:35AM -0800, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote: > That would be awesome! Maybe it is not completely impossible to find a > suitable Lisp student, if we advertise it in the right places? well, we can add a project, still, not too late? explore and implement Python/Pyth

Re: [sage-devel] Re: RFC: demote giac to optional

On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 03:45:17PM +0100, Vincent Delecroix wrote: > I think it would be more productive to make two PRs: one for making > the package which is likely to create a consensus and one for demoting > to optional which might be controversial. The package is already done, it's in https:/

Re: [sage-devel] Any interest in making building from source on Mac more robust?

Dear all, To summarise what I found qua Mike's installation issues: It seems that macOS/XCode stopped providing Pythons what are good enough to use to install Sage from source, as their networking is broken in some way which make it impossible to fetch packages for installation. The main sympto

Re: [sage-devel] Cython extension modules in optional spkgs

On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 01:33:24PM -0600, Marc Culler wrote: > OK. But clearly it is a bug that the CoxeterGroup package raises: > RuntimeError: coxeter3 must be installed > when coxeter3 *is* installed but sagemath_coxeter3 is not installed. naming conventions... Python package coxeter3 is ins

Re: [sage-devel] Cython extension modules in optional spkgs

On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 11:03:42AM -0800, Marc Culler wrote: > Yes, I have a log file for coxeter3 which built fine. > > The problem turned out to be that I had to use BOTH ---enable-coxeter3 AND > -enable-sagemath_coxeter3. With the latter option, the .so file gets build > and installed as exp

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage-10.4 fails to build

On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 09:40:03AM -0700, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > According to your log, this is a build failure using the experimental > option "./configure --enable-system-site-packages". > > This failure comes from use of system NumPy 2; try with > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38227

Re: [sage-devel] Sage-10.4 fails to build

On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 07:09:20AM -0700, Niranjana K M wrote: > At first I had flint-3.1.0 from Gentoo portage. Got same errors and build > failed. The I uninstalled flint and its dependents from Gentoo and let the > Sage choose its flint spkg. Again it also failed with same errors. I can confi

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal (redo): Make pytest, pytest_mock, pytest_xdist + dependencies standard packages

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 10:08:20AM -0700, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > On Friday, May 31, 2024 at 9:38:30 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > frankly, I don't see anything new here. > > > There does not have to be anything new. > The proposal stands on its own merit. Haven't it been discussed alrea

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal (redo): Make pytest, pytest_mock, pytest_xdist + dependencies standard packages

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 01:04:38PM -0400, David Roe wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 12:38 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 11:25 PM Matthias Koeppe > > wrote: > > > > > > We added the packages as optional "pip" packages (see > > https://deploy-livedoc--sagemath.netlify.app

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project)

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 07:03:29AM -0700, Marc Culler wrote: > On Thursday, April 25, 2024 at 8:28:48 AM UTC-5 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > Essential components of sagelib such as GAP, Singular, don't run on > native Windows > > > I was amused to find the following statement on the GAP forum > <

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project)

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 08:09:48AM -0700, Marc Culler wrote: > The GAP project provides a native Windows installer > . > > So, evidently, it is possible to build GAP for Windows. They do not seem > to provide b

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization

On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 02:28:13AM -0700, 'Peter Mueller' via sage-devel wrote: > I just figured out that the installation from source (even with the > explicit configure option `--with-system-singular`) on an up to date arch > linux machine ignores the installed singular (`pacman -Q singular` r

Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals

that the call to characteristic() which causes a crash is a leftover which can simply be removed. https://github.com/dimpase/sage/pull/6 (not yet a PR to the Sage repo, just want to see results of tests) Dima -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sag

Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 09:27:15AM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote: > Giving short testcase, can someone else reproduce it? > Also attaching backtrace. yes, I can reproduce this on a recent 10.4.beta - the backtrace I get it more or less the same as the one attached - and it's in an unexpected to me

Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 04:23:13PM -0700, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > On Wednesday, April 10, 2024 at 3:25:16 PM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 11:10 PM Matthias Koeppe > wrote: > > On Wednesday, April 10, 2024 at 2:40:18 PM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > There is simply

Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Follow NEP 29: Recommended Python version

On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 06:34:25AM -0700, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > Thanks, Tobias, for opening this vote thread. Here on sage-devel, this is a > much better setting than what you attempted > in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35404#issuecomment-1504474945 > > I am voting NO. > > There's a

Re: [sage-devel] Why SR('expression') fail on some but not others?

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:08:02PM -0700, 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-devel wrote: > I read integrals from a file. They all are stored as strings. > > Then use SR('expression') inside sagemath to convert them to sagemath > symbolic expression before calling integrate. > > Some give parsing err

Re: [sage-devel] Colours

On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 04:17:53PM +0200, Georgi Guninski wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 4:08 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > gmail still supports application passwords, so one can still bypass 2FA for > > sending/receiving mail to/from gmail. > > > > my previous message in this thread was sent

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Colours

On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 03:15:03AM -0800, Kwankyu Lee wrote: > Again. Sorry. I think this happens if you use Google's interface to Groups, rather than an email client. Posting using an email client (set to send in text mode - but probably not necessarily) should be enough to avoid this. Dima -

Re: [sage-devel] Unable to build sage

On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 06:44:59PM -0700, Daniel Bump wrote: > > > On Saturday, July 4, 2020 at 3:12:36 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > I guess this is due to gfortran 10. > > We still do not support gcc 10, I think. > > Can you downgrade it to gfortran 9? > > > > I had gfortran10 which

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Could someone point me to the code that supports math on symbolic equations?

On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 04:07:47PM -0700, Jonathan wrote: > Emmanuel, > > Thanks, that is one of the places I was starting. It turns out that doesn't > quite pick up the necessary stuff from the `Expr` type. I have had better > luck extending the base type `Expr`. It was not hard to get the ari

[sage-devel] Fwd: error at installing sage: Error installing package zlib-1.2.11.p0

On Friday, April 3, 2020 at 8:11:38 AM UTC+8, Alejandra Kandus wrote: > > Hello, I am quite new at using sage, I tried to install the last version > of sage in my notebook. It runs linux 18.04 and is 32 bts. The error > message was: "Error installing package zlib-1.2.11.p0". Did anyone of you

Re: [sage-devel] Sage Cryptography Interactions

On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 08:19:01AM -0700, Carson Kurtz wrote: > I am currently a student working with a professor at a partner university > to help improve the cryptography resources on Sage. Earlier in August of > 2019, her and a colleague developed some Sage interactions that could help > both

Re: [sage-devel] Different behavior in normal usage and when building the doc (decimal separator / tachyon syntax error)

On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:37:25PM +0100, Jean-Florent Raymond wrote: > > I have been investigating a bug that happened when I tried to build the > documentation of sage 9.0 on a new machine. > It seems to be the same as described in > > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/5jajeJiJNiY/di

Re: [sage-devel] Integrals don't coincide with the ones directly done by maxima

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 05:36:59AM -0700, mmarco wrote: > I am trying to pinpoint the following bug: > > sage: integral(sqrt(1+cos(x)^2),x) > -1/24*sin(3*x) + 1/8*sin(x) > > > which is incorrect. One would think that maxima is returning a wrong > answer, but if we ask directly to maxima, it le

Re: [sage-devel] The future of the Mac Application on Mojave

Hi Ivan, thanks for looking into this. On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 06:25:53PM -0700, Ivan Andrus wrote: > I haven't worked on Sage for quite a while, but it was brought to my > attention (thanks Karl-Dieter), that the Mac application no longer works on > Mojave. I believe this has to do with the fac

Re: [sage-devel] Re: internet tests failing

On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 06:05:35AM -0700, kcrisman wrote: > This is all very helpful. Hopefully I'll not miss if there is a beta or rc > version of Sage implementing this - if I fix this with the script now, I > won't be able to test "vanilla"-ish Sage. well, to break it back it suffices to rem

Re: [sage-devel] how to log sage output for long running program

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 10:21:48PM -0700, 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-devel wrote: > > > On Mar 15, 2019, at 21:46 , Ai Bo wrote: > > > > I am running a long running program. I would like to log the output. > > I have tried: > > ../sage-8.6/sage test.sage > test.log & > > > > There is nothin

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Computing determinants of obviously singular matrices

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 02:59:05PM -0700, Kwankyu Lee wrote: > > If the determinant is obviously zero, then you don't need to run the > computation. If a preprocessing to check zero rows or columns is added, > then the determinant computation would become slower for usual nontrivial > cases. I

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 07:12:29AM -0800, kcrisman wrote: > > > > http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/repl/sage/repl/ipython_kernel/interact.html > > http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/prep/Quickstarts/Interact.html > > > > > Thanks; I knew about the second one, since I wrote it :-) but the firs

Re: [sage-devel] check dependencies

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 02:27:13PM +0200, Thierry wrote: > Hi, > > on the way to upgrading networkx, i noticed that the source code contains > tests, but we do not ship any spkg-check script for that (yet). > > However, the check process requires nose, which is an optional package > (note that ne

[sage-devel] Re: SageNB -> Jupyter conversion needs testers

>>> http://localhost:/?token=4b2b23550be648f42c955b4dfe2f8ab6890553699fb8b386 >>> [I 16:07:48.266 NotebookApp] Use Control-C to stop this server and shut >>> down all kernels (twice to skip confirmation). >>> [C 16:07:48.267 NotebookApp] >>>

[sage-devel] Re: SageNB -> Jupyter conversion needs testers

it does not work for me, or at least I must be doing something wrong. I get to the page listing the notebooks to convert, and then, if I click on a notebook, I get a weird page asking for a password or a token. Password or token: Log in Token authentication is enabled. You need to open the note

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-edu] Re: Sage-enabled textbook for Abstract Algebra

On Wednesday, 5 August 2015 00:20:02 UTC+1, Rob Beezer wrote: > > > On Sunday, August 2, 2015 at 1:12:29 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> One thing I didn't like was the inability to hide the contents frame(?) >> on the left-hand side. It just sits there for no good reason, and is a >> dist