[X ] Yes, include these in Sage
On Oct 1, 2:37 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 30, 3:23 pm, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [X ] Yes, include these in Sage
>
> In total we had a whole lot of votes for inclusion (too lazt to count)
> and none against it, so I cons
modules over Integers(n), but it must be possible to
> define such a thing.
>
> John
>
> 2008/9/24 David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:27 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> On Sep 24, 12:16 am,
I have coded a program in cython called "elements_in_linear_span" that
generates a set of codewords from a matrix (a matrix space must be
defined) over a ring of intergers. This function almost does what
Magma does with:
> R:=RingOfIntegers(9);
> code := LinearCode(sub 0, 0],[0, 0, 4, 5, 0], [0,
yeah, but I have already found the problem, Magma does what my program
does in a different way, so it gets a different result
On Sep 8, 1:43 am, Willem Jan Palenstijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 10:47:59PM -0700, cesarnda wrote:
>
> > I do the f
I do the following in cython:
for index1 from 0 <= index1 < size:
vectorGen[index1] = 0
vectorGen[0] = -1
#main for for obtaining the whole set
for index from 0 <= index < limit: #for1
localLimit = ceil( index / modulus )
value = vectorGen[0] + 1
