Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: move Sage development to Github

2022-09-21 Thread Rusydi H. Makarim
+1 for Github On Thu, 22 Sep 2022, 07:15 Nathan Dunfield, wrote: > +1 for GitHub > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@

Re: [sage-devel] [Crypto] S-box Linear Approximation Matrix scaling

2018-02-16 Thread Rusydi H. Makarim
Hi Friedrich, The way it is defined in the code is consistent with the paper mentioned in the documentation (H. Heys paper on tutorial of differential and linear cryptanalysis) which, I believe, is used by many cryptanalysis researchers or students to learn differential and linear cryptanalysis fo

[sage-devel] Citing PolyBoRi/BRiAl in a Paper

2018-02-15 Thread Rusydi H. Makarim
Hi, Since PolyBoRi has been renamed to BRiAl in SageMath, what would be right way to cite it in a paper ? Should I mention it as PolyBoRi or should they both be mentioned together (e.g PolyBoRi/BRiAl) ? Regards, -- Rusydi H. Makarim PhD Student Mathematisch Instituut <h

[sage-devel] Profiling memory usage from sage command-line

2017-10-04 Thread Rusydi H. Makarim
Hi Suppose I have a polynomial Ideal 'J' and I want to call J.groebner_basis() . My goal is to profile the memory usage of groebner basis computation in SageMath. How can I do this from the sage command line ? Regards, Rusydi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [sage-devel] Refactoring SBox Code

2017-05-10 Thread Rusydi H. Makarim
Hi Friedrich, On 10-05-17 15:04, Friedrich Wiemer wrote: > Martin Albrecht commented on issue 20336 > (https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20336#comment:10) that the SBox code > should be moved from crypto.mq.SBox to some other place. I think that > this is a simple enough issue to get started contr

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Implements change_ring() for BooleanPolynomialRing (#21817) -- Needs Review

2016-11-24 Thread Rusydi H. Makarim
Hi On 23/11/2016 3:53 PM, Simon King wrote: > Hi, > > On 2016-11-22, Rusydi H. Makarim wrote: >>> Shouldn't it raise an error as soon as the "new" base ring is different >>> from GF(2)? >>> Apparently restricting base_ring only for GF(2) cause

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Implements change_ring() for BooleanPolynomialRing (#21817) -- Needs Review

2016-11-22 Thread Rusydi H. Makarim
Hi, On 22/11/2016 10:27 AM, Simon King wrote: > Hi, > > On 2016-11-21, Rusydi H. Makarim wrote: >> But I argue that a proper behaviour of >> change_ring() in BooleanPolynomialRing is to return a BooleanPolynomialRing >> whenever a base_ring is not given in the argum

[sage-devel] Implements change_ring() for BooleanPolynomialRing (#21817) -- Needs Review

2016-11-21 Thread Rusydi H. Makarim
ariate polynomial ring. But I argue that a proper behaviour of change_ring() in BooleanPolynomialRing is to return a BooleanPolynomialRing whenever a base_ring is not given in the argument and return multivariate polynomial ring otherwise. Regards, -- Rusydi H. Makarim PhD Student Mathem

[sage-devel] Confusion over change_ring() - #21780

2016-11-10 Thread Rusydi H. Makarim
causes some confusion for me too). I would like to bring more people in this discussion to resolve #21780 <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21780> and I am also looking for better suggestions/arguments from other developers. Regards, -- Rusydi H. Makarim PhD Student Mathematis

[sage-devel] change_ring() in PolynomialSequence and Ideal of Multivariate Polynomial

2016-11-03 Thread Rusydi H. Makarim
Ideal ? Or maybe its better to implement more unambiguous methods (e.g, change_term_order(), change_var_names(), etc) ? Best Regards, -- Rusydi H. Makarim PhD Student Mathematisch Instituut <http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/>, Universiteit Leiden <http://www.leiden.edu/> and Crypt

[sage-devel] #21780 - Implements change_ring() for PolynomialSequence

2016-10-29 Thread Rusydi H. Makarim
HI all, Trac ticket #21780 <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21780> is a small enhancement that implements change_ring() directly in PolynomialSequence. I would really appreciate if someone is willing to review it -- only 2 lines of python code ;-) Regards, -- Rusydi H. Makarim PhD S

[sage-devel] Trac #21252 - Nonlinear Invariants of an S-Box

2016-10-04 Thread Rusydi H. Makarim
32.pdf. Best Regards, -- Rusydi H. Makarim PhD Student Mathematisch Instituut <http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/>, Universiteit Leiden <http://www.leiden.edu/> and Cryptology Group <https://projects.cwi.nl/crypto/index.php>, Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI) <https://www.cwi.

[sage-devel] #20611 needs review : more functionalities for mq.SBox

2016-07-15 Thread Rusydi H. Makarim
Hi, I committed a patch to provide more features for SAGE mq.SBox with two helpers to construct bigger S-Box from smaller S-Boxes (Feistel and MISTY construction). I would appreciate if someone willing to review the ticket. https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20611 Best Regards, -- Rusydi H

Re: [sage-devel] Re: FGb - Gröbner basis computation code

2016-05-03 Thread Rusydi H. Makarim
; To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, v

[sage-devel] More cryptography-related functionality for mq.SBox : #20336 (needs review)

2016-03-31 Thread Rusydi H. Makarim
egards, -- Rusydi H. Makarim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send ema