Excuse my slow response (my android phone is not my regular phone and
I didn't have it with me for a couple of days).
> That's actually different than what they are describing, and seems to
> have to do with Codemirror or how the browser is interacting (or our
> code for dealing with CodeMirror).
Same problems here (Samsung Galaxy Mini, 2.3.5). I can connect to
aleph.sagemath.org on my phone, but 1+1 throws a syntax error
depending on whether I toggle plaintext input or not.
On Jan 24, 8:03 pm, Aaron Dutle wrote:
> I've got the same problems on my Droid X2, running 2.3.3. I can access
> a
+1
On Nov 22, 9:00 am, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:36 PM, William Stein wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:50 PM, David Roe wrote:
> >> The coercion graph in Sage is supposed to be transitive. This
> >> assumption is explicit in the documentation of sage.structure.coe
Hi Syd,
I'm also quite interested in an implementation of Hess' algorithm in
Sage. If you keep me posted and break the task down into small
patches, I'd love to help!
On Nov 17, 4:43 am, "syd.lavas...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> Sorry, for the spam threat. I just wanted to target somebody on the
> ticke
> Given f in R[x,y], I think f(x=a, y=b) should do exactly the same
> thing as f(a,b). The parent should be the same as R.base_ring()(0) + a
> + b.
+1
> The difficult case is what to do for f(x=5). Should that be the same
> as f(x=5, y=y) or a univariate polynomial?
I would certainly read f(x=5) a
> Given f in R[x,y], I think f(x=a, y=b) should do exactly the same
> thing as f(a,b). The parent should be the same as R.base_ring()(0) + a
> + b.
+1
> The difficult case is what to do for f(x=5). Should that be the same
> as f(x=5, y=y) or a univariate polynomial?
I would certainly read f(x=5) a
