[sage-devel] Re: ask.sagemath.org is not down, but seriously prone...

It looks like ask.sagemath.org went down after all. Does anybody know what's going on? Regards, Max On Saturday, February 1, 2025 at 4:33:30 PM UTC-5 emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote: > It turns out that ask.sagemath.org may have rejected my comment for the > use of the word *unadulterated*, which

[sage-devel] [spkg-install] parsetexi/Parsetexi.c: loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched

On my system compiling the current development version of Sage fails with the following error: [spkg-install] Making all in doc [spkg-install] Making all in info [spkg-install] ./build_html.sh [spkg-install] /usr/bin/bash /usr/local/sage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/maxima-5.47.0/src/missing m

Re: [sage-devel] sage 10.4beta9 and locally installed libntl

, that error is unexpected and should not have happened. Regards, Max On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 3:43 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On 19 June 2024 18:28:23 BST, Max Alekseyev wrote: > >Hello, > > > >I had a locally installed NTL compiled from sources with default options.

[sage-devel] sage 10.4beta9 and locally installed libntl

Hello, I had a locally installed NTL compiled from sources with default options. While being compiled from sources, Sage failed to link with libntl.a with a few complaints like [spkg-install] /usr/bin/ld: ///usr/local/lib/libntl.a(ZZX.o): relocation R_X86_64_TPOFF32 against `_ZZN3NTL8Plai

Re: [sage-devel] SuiteSparse and sage and sparse_matrix.LU()

One more option would be umfack via scikits.umfpack: https://scikit-umfpack.github.io/scikit-umfpack/reference/scikits.umfpack.UmfpackLU.html Regards, Max On Wednesday, February 28, 2024 at 7:07:53 AM UTC-5 Animesh Shree wrote: > One thing I would like to suggest. > > We can provide multiple ways

[sage-devel] Re: Poll: deprecate backslash operator

Here is another bug apparently related to the preparser and "\": https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/37467 Regards, Max On Wednesday, October 4, 2023 at 1:01:54 AM UTC-4 John H Palmieri wrote: > By the way, see https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/36194 for a bug > related to the prepars

[sage-devel] Re: some core features are broken for bipartite graphs

... and here is one more bug, which is truly weird: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33255 (distinct graphs have equals hashes) Bipartite graphs routines are totally unreliable ;-( Regards, Max On Sunday, January 30, 2022 at 10:34:37 AM UTC-5 Max Alekseyev wrote: > Hello, > > I'd

[sage-devel] some core features are broken for bipartite graphs

Hello, I'd like to bring your attention to two bugs related to handling bipartite graphs: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33246 https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33249 The first one is especially severe as it produces an inconsistent object and can easily propagate errors. I have already identif

Re: [sage-devel] python3-3.9.2 failed to build while running 'sage -i pynormaliz' (ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'binascii')

s of errors here and there. It's very frustrating ;( I was able to install Normaliz from the binary distribution of Sage 9.2 without an issue. Max On Saturday, June 19, 2021 at 8:29:28 AM UTC-4 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 12:41 PM Max Alekseyev wrote: > > >

[sage-devel] errors while compiling sage-9.3 from sources

I've tried to compile sage 9.3 from sources and faces the following two issues: 1) At the very end after saying "Sage build/upgrade complete!" building hangs and does nothing (I waited for a few hours). Breaking it with Ctrl+C reveals that it's was in the stage of building nauty-27r1.p1 I attac

Re: [sage-devel] python3-3.9.2 failed to build while running 'sage -i pynormaliz' (ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'binascii')

at 7:18:00 PM UTC-4 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 11:02 PM Max Alekseyev wrote: > > > > I'll try the source distribution, but I'd like to mention that building > optional packages from a binary distribution worked well in earlier Sage > versions

Re: [sage-devel] python3-3.9.2 failed to build while running 'sage -i pynormaliz' (ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'binascii')

1 at 10:37 PM Max Alekseyev wrote: > > > > I installed Sage from sage-9.3-Ubuntu_20.04-x86_64.tar.bz2 > > this is a binary distribution. It doesn't really allow for building > optional packages. > Please get the source distribution instead. > > > > > &

Re: [sage-devel] python3-3.9.2 failed to build while running 'sage -i pynormaliz' (ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'binascii')

, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:20 PM Max Alekseyev wrote: > > > > Please find config.log attached. The system has Python 3.8.5 installed. > > ## Checking whether SageMath should install SPKG python3... ## > ## ## > configure

Re: [sage-devel] python3-3.9.2 failed to build while running 'sage -i pynormaliz' (ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'binascii')

gmail.com wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 9:46 PM Max Alekseyev wrote: > > > > I'd be happy to, but Sage somehow decides that it needs to build its own > Python from scratch. > > I simply sun 'sage -i pynormaliz' and get a broken sage as a result. > > Wh

Re: [sage-devel] python3-3.9.2 failed to build while running 'sage -i pynormaliz' (ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'binascii')

t build Python, use one from the system. > > On Fri, 18 Jun 2021, 21:09 Max Alekseyev, wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I'm trying to install PyNormaliz within freshly installed Sage 9.3 within >> freshly installed Ubuntu 20.04.02 LTS.It breaks giving the following error:

[sage-devel] AttributeError on calling sage.misc.log.log_text() in SageMath 8.9

Please advise on the following error. Thanks, Max ┌┐ │ SageMath version 8.9, Release Date: 2019-09-29 │ │ Using Python 2.7.15. Type "help()" for help. │ └──