[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.4.alpha1 released!

2010-03-10 Thread M. Yurko
On Mar 10, 4:01 am, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote: > On 9 bře, 20:45, Mike Hansen wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > This release should fix many of the outstanding issues on Solaris as > > well as some more of the combinatorics code from Sage Days 20. > > > Source tarball: > > >http://sage.math.washingt

[sage-devel] Re: Issue with Sage, Cython, and Numpy

2010-02-03 Thread M. Yurko
Thanks for the help. It works now. I probably would be good if it was found automatically. On Feb 2, 11:12 pm, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Feb 2, 2010, at 7:40 PM, M. Yurko wrote: > > > For the simple example I just used pyximport. For the extension module > > I used a setup.py

[sage-devel] Re: Issue with Sage, Cython, and Numpy

2010-02-02 Thread M. Yurko
On Feb 2, 10:31 pm, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Feb 2, 2010, at 7:20 PM, M. Yurko wrote: > > > The small example that I posted used pyximport. The extension module > > that made me originally see the issue was built with a setup.py > > distutils script. I have the same

[sage-devel] Re: Issue with Sage, Cython, and Numpy

2010-02-02 Thread M. Yurko
issue happens if the setup.py script uses either the original .pyx files or the generated .c files. On Feb 2, 9:33 pm, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Feb 2, 2010, at 4:11 PM, M. Yurko wrote: > > > > > On Feb 2, 6:44 pm, "Georg S. Weber" > > wrote: > >

[sage-devel] Re: Issue with Sage, Cython, and Numpy

2010-02-02 Thread M. Yurko
On Feb 2, 6:44 pm, "Georg S. Weber" wrote: > On 2 Feb., 21:26, Michael Yurko wrote: > > > > > Hello All, > > > I've recently been building an extension module using both cython and numpy. > > It works fine with my system-wide install of python with numpy and cython as > > well as my install of

[sage-devel] Re: Buffer types only allowed as function local variables

2010-01-18 Thread M. Yurko
Sorry about this. I meant to send this to the cython-users list. On Jan 18, 7:26 pm, Michael Yurko wrote: > I've figured out what Dag meant in his original post. I've attached a quick > example in case anyone else is having the same issue. > > -- > Mike Yurko > >  cnp_tester.py > < 1KViewDownload

[sage-devel] Re: View images from sage over ssh

2009-10-30 Thread M. Yurko
. > > notebook(address='sage.math.washington.edu', accounts=True, > secure=True, port=) > > where is an integer > 1000 > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:18 AM, M. Yurko wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > I'm looking at a patch right now that changes graph

[sage-devel] View images from sage over ssh

2009-10-30 Thread M. Yurko
Hi all, I'm looking at a patch right now that changes graph layout and I have applied it to my install on sage.math. Is there anyway to see the image that is created when viewing a graph over ssh? Thanks, Michael Yurko --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group,

[sage-devel] Re: numerical integration

2009-10-27 Thread M. Yurko
I definitely like the ability to call different libraries with an algorithm argument. It would also be nice to include mpmath as an option since it support many different algorithms and arbitrary precision. On Oct 27, 5:05 pm, Jason Grout wrote: > Writing some class worksheets yesterday exposed

[sage-devel] Website, Trac etc. down

2009-10-01 Thread M. Yurko
Right now, it appears that the website, trac, the wiki, etc. are all down. Is everyone else having the same issue? -- Michael Yurko --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an ema

[sage-devel] Re: [femhub] some suggestions to web notebook

2009-09-24 Thread M. Yurko
That editor seemed as fast as the native text area to me. I am also using firefox 3.5.2 so it could be quite browser dependent. On Sep 24, 7:11 am, William Stein wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote: > > > Regarding syntax highlighting, I just found a list on wikiped

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4 sources released

2009-03-12 Thread M. Yurko
I'm running 64-bit Ubuntu 8.10 on a Core 2 processor, and Sage 3.4 has failed to build for me twice on the same error. It appears to occur on the compilation of PolyBoRi and I get the following error: polybori/src/BoolePolynomial.cc:915: instantiated from here polybori/include/CTermGenerator.h:

[sage-devel] Re: #auto is still broken in Sage 3.3

2009-02-26 Thread M. Yurko
, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:52 PM, mabshoff wrote: > > > On Feb 24, 7:17 pm, "M. Yurko" wrote: > >> OK, upon further inspection, I realized that something must have gone > >> wrong during the upgrade, so I''l just recompile from scratch again. > >>

[sage-devel] Re: #auto is still broken in Sage 3.3

2009-02-24 Thread M. Yurko
e notebook wasn't upgraded somehow? On Feb 24, 8:10 pm, Mike Hansen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:04 PM, M. Yurko wrote: > > > Using #auto to evaluate cells when the worksheets are opened still > > fails for me even after I upgraded to Sage 3.3. I did a quick search >

[sage-devel] Re: #auto is still broken in Sage 3.3

2009-02-24 Thread M. Yurko
On Feb 24, 8:10 pm, Mike Hansen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:04 PM, M. Yurko wrote: > > > Using #auto to evaluate cells when the worksheets are opened still > > fails for me even after I upgraded to Sage 3.3. I did a quick search > > and found ticket 5020 relati

[sage-devel] #auto is still broken in Sage 3.3

2009-02-24 Thread M. Yurko
Using #auto to evaluate cells when the worksheets are opened still fails for me even after I upgraded to Sage 3.3. I did a quick search and found ticket 5020 relating to this issue, but it was supposedly merged in the first sage 3.3 Alpha. I am running 64-bit Ubuntu 8.10 on a Core 2 Duo and my ver

[sage-devel] Minor typo in docs for zeta_zeros()

2008-06-13 Thread M. Yurko
In the reference manual (13.7 Tables of zeros of the Riemann-Zeta function) it states that zeta_zeros() gives a list of the "first 1 imaginary parts." However, it should say "first 10 imaginary parts" (add a zero to read 100,000). Also, it might serve to mention that this is an optional pa