Re: [sage-devel] Behavior of optional packages

2024-07-18 Thread Louis Deaett
If I may, I'd like to ask you to expand on this comment: > It's time to retire "sage -i". Why do you say that? And what specifically would be the replacement? Please forgive my ignorance; I am currently involved in an effort to package some code for Sage, and if there are changes coming to how

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Can I build Sage via MacPorts under MacOS 10.9?

2023-05-26 Thread Louis Deaett
Aha – thank you! I will start playing with this... – Louis On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 12:17:56 PM UTC-4 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 4:53 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 3:09 AM Louis Deaett > wrote: > > > > &

[sage-devel] Re: Can I build Sage via MacPorts under MacOS 10.9?

2023-05-21 Thread Louis Deaett
uld work. See > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/31505 for some relevant > information. Others might have direct experience with it. > > On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 11:24:07 AM UTC-7 Louis Deaett wrote: > >> I'm interested in Sage development (and contributing some

[sage-devel] Can I build Sage via MacPorts under MacOS 10.9?

2023-05-05 Thread Louis Deaett
I'm interested in Sage development (and contributing some enhancements) and so I'd like to be able to build the current release (and ultimately the development branch) from source. I am running macOS 10.9 (Mavericks) because that is what I prefer, and because some of my hardware tops out at tha