t for).
--
Konstantin Kliakhandler
http://slumpy.org
)°) )°( (°(
On 25 January 2017 at 00:50, François Bissey wrote:
> It depend what compilers are exposed. Last time someone filled
> a bug, gfortran from brew was interfering with the gfortran sage
> installs. https://tra
gfortran manually somehow and it interfered with Sage's.
Also, if there will be a build-from-source variant in HB (which I am happy
to write if there is the demand), it can easily mark what packages it is
incompatible with.
--
Konstantin Kliakhandler
http://slumpy.org
)°) )°( (°
Ah, I misunderstood the question. AFAICT homebrew does not adversely affect
the sage built. In particular, I was able to successfully build it several
times with 7.5.betaX 7.5.rcX and 7.5, on two separate machines (on which I
also have HB installed).
--
Konstantin Kliakhandler
http
rs homebrew has
> become the de-facto package manager and in older OS versions openssl was
> present, so it would be fairly reasonable to just prompt the user to
> install homebrew and then install via homebrew.
>
> Cheers,
> Kosta
>
> --
> Konstantin Kliakhandler
> http:
n (in an environment variable) if it is defined, and
otherwise in the location that homebrew installs to.
--
Konstantin Kliakhandler
http://slumpy.org
)°) )°( (°(
On 18 January 2017 at 20:56, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 18, 2017 at 1:20:20 PM UTC,
reasonable to just prompt the user to install homebrew and then
install via homebrew.
Cheers,
Kosta
--
Konstantin Kliakhandler
http://slumpy.org
)°) )°( (°(
On 15 January 2017 at 15:51, Emmanuel Charpentier <
emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A first step <ht
