lliam Stein wrote:
> Thanks!!
>
> On 4/26/07, Jonathan William Bober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Never mind all that - it seems that the fix is easy. Just after
> >
> > symbols = {operator.lt:' < ', operator.le:' <=
Never mind all that - it seems that the fix is easy. Just after
symbols = {operator.lt:' < ', operator.le:' <= ', operator.eq:' == ',
operator.ne:' != ',
operator.ge:' >= ', operator.gt:' > '}
maxima_symbols = dict(symbols)
maxima_symbols[operator.eq] = '='
in calculus/eq
Unless I am misunderstanding something, 2.5.alpha0 seems to have some
problems with equality testing. A typical example is
sage: bool(sqrt(2) == 1)
False
sage: bool(sqrt(2) != 1)
False
However, the following does work correctly:
sage: bool(sqrt(2) < 1)
False
sage: bool(sqrt(2) > 1)
True
This s
It also builds fine for me under Ubuntu Edgy Eft, on an Intel Core Duo.
Like others have reported, the only doctest failures seem to be in
multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx.
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 02:35 -0700, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've posted a preliminary SAGE-2.5.alpha0 tarball here:
