2012-11-26 21:26, v...@ukr.net skrev:
By the way, I downloaded the t1-cyrillic_4.16_all.deb package from
here: http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/t1-cyrillic
and unpacked it. It turned out that this archive contains the files
with commas in 'ItalicAngle' field. So it does not seem to be the
pro
2012-11-26 04:52, Dima Pasechnik skrev:
On 2012-11-26, v_2e wrote:
I removed the package 't1-cyrillic' which contained the files with
comma in 'ItalicAngle', and now the Sage tests pass fine.
I think that 't1-cyrillic' triggers a bug -
E.g. on a system without cygillic locale one e.g. has
/
2012-11-25 21:41, v_2e skrev:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 09:24:38 +1300
François Bissey wrote:
You may be missing a font Vladimir.
Yes, I thought so too, but which one? How can I find it out?
Another idea, after some reading on the internet
In another message, you pasted the following output
2012-11-25 21:41, v_2e skrev:
You may be missing a font Vladimir.
Yes, I thought so too, but which one? How can I find it out?
Trying to help by random guessing:
If I was missing a font related to these kinds of things, I would first
try to install the debian package texlive-fonts-reco
2012-11-25 17:20, v_2e skrev:
I'm not sure this is important, but I decided to report it just in
case. These are the failed tests of Sage-5.4.1 on Debian Wheezy.
--
The following tests failed:
> [...]
On my (amd64) debi
2012-10-15 01:36, jaebond skrev:
On Sunday, October 14, 2012 3:09:25 AM UTC-4, Johan Grönqvist wrote:
"gcc -v" can tell you what you have ; in my case the target is
arm-linux-gnueabihf.
I ran gcc -vand it came back with arm-linux-gnueabiwithout either hf or el.
The name
2012-10-14 07:50, Dima Pasechnik skrev:
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 05:25:24 UTC+8, Johan Grönqvist wrote:
2012-10-13 20:23, jaebond skrev:
> |/home/ubuntu/sage/spkg/bin/sage: line489:
/home/ubuntu/sage/local/bin/python: No such fileor directory
>
In that case the p
2012-10-13 20:23, jaebond skrev:
|/home/ubuntu/sage/spkg/bin/sage:line489:
/home/ubuntu/sage/local/bin/python:No such fileor directory
However, I have looked in/home/ubuntu/sage/local/bin and there is a filepython
which links topython2 which links topython2.7. It was suggested
2012-05-02 21:44, Jeroen Demeyer skrev:
On 2012-05-02 21:40, Johan Grönqvist wrote:
2012-05-02 10:44, Jeroen Demeyer skrev:
I made some changes to http://wiki.sagemath.org/SupportedPlatforms
The only debian version mentioned for sage-5.0 is "Debian 5.0 on x86
(Both 32-bit and 64-bit)&q
2012-05-02 10:44, Jeroen Demeyer skrev:
I made some changes to http://wiki.sagemath.org/SupportedPlatforms
The only debian version mentioned for sage-5.0 is "Debian 5.0 on x86
(Both 32-bit and 64-bit)" which is unsupported since February.
Debian 6.0, the only released and supported version a
2012-04-29 16:35, David Kirkby skrev:
The fact there are functions in Sage untested is worrying, and I think
its fair to say most people would like to see 100% doctest coverage,
but IMHO, we need a plan for this to happen, and the plan inforced,
otherwise this will not happen soon. So I'm suggest
2012-03-18 07:46, Yukun skrev:
I played around with the Sage notebook, and I think it would be
convenient if math typesetting is available for input (like in
mathematica), as it'll make it much easier to input long and complicated
functions.
I will not take part in the GSOC discussion, so this
2011-12-16 19:13, John Foster skrev:
It makes no sense to me why we can not use the already installed
mathematics apps that are available to us and fill their requirements as
'dependencies'. I dont mean that the current process is wrong. I just
don't get it & I want to understand.
I am not one
2010-10-14 06:01, Oscar Gerardo Lazo Arjona skrev:
I've been trying to solve this integral:
sage: numerical_integral(sqrt(sec(x)-1),pi/2,pi)
(nan, nan)
But that failed also... So I tried with mathematica:
numerical integration should be fairly easy to extend to complex
numbers. Am I missing so
2010-04-27 11:37, Minh Nguyen skrev:
Would you upload a patch
to the trac server to improve that documentation? If so, please CC me
on the relevant ticket and I'd be more than happy to review your
patch.
I have opened ticket 8825 and attached a patch. It is a very small
change, and by no means
2010-04-27 13:29, Gonzalo Tornaria skrev:
2010/4/27 Johan Grönqvist:
Those did not even mention that
there is an alternative definition of norm used in number theory.
Here it is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_norm
Thanks. Now I learned something new.
The norm on complex numbers is
2010-04-27 11:37, Minh Nguyen skrev:
Hi Johan,
2010/4/27 Johan Grönqvist:
The current documentation of norm() on complex numbers can be accessed
from the Sage website [1]. That documentation leaves much to be
desired, even though it makes the distinction between the complex norm
and the
2010-04-26 21:26, John Cremona skrev:
In number theory it is very useful to have this norm-alisation, as
well as the square root one also called abs. It's a special case of
the algebraic concept of norm(a) = product of conjugates of a.
If this was really a problem to non-number-theorists, we c
18 matches
Mail list logo
