Re: [sage-devel] More helpful error when multiplication operator is left out

2010-02-08 Thread Gustav Delius
already a ticket for that in the tracker? Gustav On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Burcin Erocal wrote: > Hi Gustav, > > On Sun, 7 Feb 2010 10:36:29 -0800 (PST) > Gustav Delius wrote: > >> I wonder whether it would be possible to give a better error message >>

[sage-devel] More helpful error when multiplication operator is left out

2010-02-07 Thread Gustav Delius
I wonder whether it would be possible to give a better error message when a user leaves out the multiplication operator in something like x(x+1). Perhaps somthing like: "Warning: you may have forgotten a multiplication operator." Currently one gets the error message: "DeprecationWarning: Substitut

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-edu] Re: sage-moodle integration

2009-03-27 Thread Gustav Delius
This is indeed a very interesting idea. Luckily something like this already exists, except that it is not using the whole of Sage but only Maxima. Take a look at stack.bham.ac.uk. Gustav Dr Gustav W Delius, Department of Mathematics University of York, York YO

[sage-devel] Re: NetworkX v0.99

2009-03-20 Thread Gustav Delius
Mike, thanks a lot for having looked into this. Gustav On Mar 20, 12:30 pm, Mike Hansen wrote: > Hello, > > On Mar 20, 12:09 am, Gustav Delius wrote: > > > I read that Sage was upgraded to using NetworkX v0.99 as of Sage > > version 3.3. However onwww.sagenb.o

[sage-devel] NetworkX v0.99

2009-03-20 Thread Gustav Delius
I read that Sage was upgraded to using NetworkX v0.99 as of Sage version 3.3. However on www.sagenb.org, one still has to use networkx.XGraph() class even though that has been removed from NetworkX v0.99. Why is that? I believe www.sagenb.org is running Sage version 3.4. Was the upgrade to Network