Re: [sage-devel] Re: RFC: New Build/Packaging System

2014-06-21 Thread Aron Ahmadia
Also, I just merged Volker's pull request in to <#> master. You shouldn't need to use his hashdist branch. A On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Aron Ahmadia wrote: > Wow, this is really impressive work! > > A > > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Volk

Re: [sage-devel] Re: RFC: New Build/Packaging System

2014-06-21 Thread Aron Ahmadia
Wow, this is really impressive work! A On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > PS: I just remembered that this is using file globs, so you need hashdist > from this branch: https://github.com/vbraun/hashdist/tree/files_glob. > Though it should be merged upstream soon. > > > > On

[sage-devel] Re: [hashdist-group] Re: RFC: New Build/Packaging System

2014-06-18 Thread Aron Ahmadia
I've got a standing commitment at 1700 EDT / 2100 UTC, but I believe Dag is proposing 1300 PDT / 1600 EDT / 2000 UTC / 2200 CEST Does 20:00 UTC work for everyone? A On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn < d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no> wrote: > Can we do two hours earlier? I'm on

[sage-devel] Re: [hashdist-group] Re: RFC: New Build/Packaging System

2014-06-18 Thread Aron Ahmadia
I can do Thursday at 1500. Sorry for not declining the original invite. A On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > How about Thursday, then? I'd suggest again 23:00 BST = 15:00 PDT = 22:00 > CEDT. That might give the kiwis a chance, too. > > > > On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 2:19:

Re: [sage-devel] Re: RFC: New Build/Packaging System

2014-06-17 Thread Aron Ahmadia
Just a general +1 to Dag and Ondrej's comments. I should take the blame (and responsibility) for places where documentation or testing is weak. hashdist itself has quite good coverage in its core, and we've been running nightly builds of the Proteus stack on a number of operating systems with it

Re: [sage-devel] RFC: New Build/Packaging System

2014-06-16 Thread Aron Ahmadia
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > In particular its not possible to build from the already-existing git > repo? I don't want to have to specify the version of sage-the-library, I > just want to build it out of the source tree. The version is the git tree > sha1 if the tree is

Re: [sage-devel] RFC: New Build/Packaging System

2014-06-16 Thread Aron Ahmadia
Hi Volker, We have implemented mirror support that does what you want: https://github.com/hashdist/hashdist/blob/master/hashdist/core/source_cache.py#L740 Mirrors are specified in the hashdist config file, not profiles, but I don't think it would be hard to add support for mirrors at the profile-

Re: [sage-devel] RFC: New Build/Packaging System

2014-06-16 Thread Aron Ahmadia
Hi Volker, Inline-repies this time: On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > For the record, Sage build a lot slower to build if you build packages one > after the other. > That's good to know. We're doing our best to get hashdist in shape for generating relocatable binary build

Re: [sage-devel] RFC: New Build/Packaging System

2014-06-16 Thread Aron Ahmadia
On Monday, June 16, 2014 8:44:43 AM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote: > > Some questions from playing around with hashdist a bit: > > * How do I build packages in parallel? > * I can't build Python on Fedora 20? What are the actual hashdist > dependencies? > > On Monday, June 16, 2014 5:53:36 AM UTC+1,