I think the CoCC is doing a phenomenal job so far. The number of
argumentative emails I received has been reduced tremendously. The CoCC
needs to balance allowing voices to be heard and not allowing disruptive
arguments and naturally the line each of us draws on what is and is not
appropriate is di
help grow it and it's not just me working on it. Would
it be better to first wait for any bugs that people might notice and then
add it into sage? Or should I just go ahead and start merging it in and any
bugs can be fixed while it's in sage itself?
-Aram
On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 at 09:36,
so additional things
I'd like to add into it, but these can be saved for after it gets
integrated into sage)
Aram
On Wed, 22 Nov 2023, 19:46 Dima Pasechnik, wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 8:29 AM Aram Dermenjian
> wrote:
> >
> > There is currently a project that is
inished as fast as I would have
liked. (It's currently set-up as a package, but eventually it should
nicely/easily be able to be integrated into sagemath itself)
Kindly,
Aram Dermenjian
On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 07:58, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> This is about a recent (2018?) generalisation of
ernal/implementation details are easy
> to change.
>
> Best,
> Travis
>
> On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 1:27:30 AM UTC+9 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, June 29, 2023 at 3:01:58 AM UTC-7 Aram Dermenjian wrote:
>>
>> it seems the method I was using
ement something like this?
Kinndly,
Aram Dermenjian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this
some kind of list fashion as currently it's a
little hard to keep track of whether people are making the same arguments
or new arguments.
Kindly,
Aram Dermenjian
On Sat, 10 Sept 2022 at 09:35, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am in the same
Just as a note to humans, we are developing a fix for this as it is
becoming a bigger and bigger issue. Here is the ticket:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23272
-Aram
On Friday, July 21, 2017 at 6:20:44 PM UTC-4, Christopher Phoenix wrote:
>
> BTW, forgot to link this, but you can see the full
Was this every able to get fixed? I'm getting the same problem here on a
different ticket
aram:/media/ubuntudata/Programming/sage (develop)$ git trac checkout 18594
Loading ticket #18594...
Checking out Trac #18594 remote branch
f257d8224aa79c85a84ced0e69f378fafedbe546 -> local branch
t/18594/f
