[sage-devel] Re: VOTE: move Sage development to Github

+1 for github On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 7:23:36 PM UTC+2 David Roe wrote: > Dear Sage developers, > Following extensive discussion, both recently > > (prompted > by issues upgrading the trac server) and over >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: RFC: zn_poly removal

esday, November 9, 2021 at 10:09:38 PM UTC+1 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 10:54 -0800, Alex J Best wrote: > > I agree the situation with zn_poly is a mess, but I think it would be > good > > to do some actual benchmarks to check if the NTL code is faster or > &

[sage-devel] Re: RFC: zn_poly removal

I must correct myself: the interval products code via NTL is not used for cyclic covers as the force NTL flag is set to true there (thanks David Roe!) On Tuesday, November 9, 2021 at 7:54:44 PM UTC+1 Alex J Best wrote: > I agree the situation with zn_poly is a mess, but I think it would be g

[sage-devel] Re: RFC: zn_poly removal

I agree the situation with zn_poly is a mess, but I think it would be good to do some actual benchmarks to check if the NTL code is faster or comparable to the zn_poly version, I don't see any data in the ticket but you do say "The one thing it does is done better by NTL" so maybe you already d

Re: [sage-devel] Matrix(GF(2^n)) with large n not working on SageMath 9.1

Looks like this is probably fixed by https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29818 On Friday, August 14, 2020 at 12:24:00 AM UTC-4 dmo...@deductivepress.ca wrote: > I confirm that the error occurs on CoCalc (with the > 9.1 or Development kernel), so there certainly seems to be a

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 8.0 Build Error on MacOS, [mpir-3.0.0.p0] Error building MPIR.

As the problem is skylake I assume mpn/x86_64/skylake/avx/addmul_1.asm is the one to patch out. On Monday, August 21, 2017 at 11:51:28 AM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Monday, August 21, 2017 at 4:15:29 PM UTC+1, Michael Frey wrote: >> >> What is the best way to do this? The file is ex

Re: [sage-devel] Re: 5.5. release notes

Okay done, yeah you're right this shows a bit more of a trend. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AkPdD0Nnsj7BdDBENDRxTVNtR3c2VEVPeWpSN3BvV1E On Thursday, December 27, 2012 10:17:10 AM UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > I think "days since last release" is not very meaningful. Can you try >

[sage-devel] Re: 5.5. release notes

I'm afraid this isn't particularly cool looking but, here is some data and a couple of charts: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AkPdD0Nnsj7BdDBENDRxTVNtR3c2VEVPeWpSN3BvV1E I was hoping to see some stronger trends, but I think due to the nature of Sage development (Sage days etc.) ther