This will unnecessarily make it more difficult to build the Sage_mac OS
binary package. In order to make that package easy to install in the way
that normal macOS users expect, it must be signed and notarized. In order
to notarize the package it must be self-contained.
Not signing and notari
On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 7:06 PM Trevor Karn wrote:
>
> Maybe we can all take a breath here. Everyone here is passionate about making
> Sage as good as it can be. This seems to be getting a bit too heated right
> now.
>
+1 - I just wanted to offer some helpful links and support, and now I
feel l
Maybe we can all take a breath here. Everyone here is passionate about
making Sage as good as it can be. This seems to be getting a bit too heated
right now.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 8:55 PM Marc Culler wrote:
> Actually, that does not even come close to solving the problem.
>
> You don't have a
Actually, that does not even come close to solving the problem.
You don't have any experience with building the Sage_macOS package,
obviously, so you don't know what the problems are.
- Marc
On Thursday, April 3, 2025 at 8:45:48 PM UTC-5 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 3 April 2025 17:48:00 GMT-0
On 3 April 2025 17:48:00 GMT-05:00, Marc Culler wrote:
>This will unnecessarily make it more difficult to build the Sage_mac OS
>binary package. In order to make that package easy to install in the way
>that normal macOS users expect, it must be signed and notarized. In order
>to notarize the p
On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 6:35 PM William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 3:48 PM Marc Culler wrote:
> >
> > This will unnecessarily make it more difficult to build the Sage_mac OS
> binary package. In order to make that package easy to install in the way
> that normal macOS users expect, i
On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 3:48 PM Marc Culler wrote:
>
> This will unnecessarily make it more difficult to build the Sage_mac OS
> binary package. In order to make that package easy to install in the way
> that normal macOS users expect, it must be signed and notarized. In order to
> notarize t
On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 7:51 AM William Stein wrote:
> Congrats and fantastic! Is it possible that you could add some
> additional "human context" for those of us on the sidelines, e.g., who
> added Meson support to Sage (you?), why?, how hard what is and how
> long did it take?, what was involv
Tobias,
Congrats and fantastic! Is it possible that you could add some
additional "human context" for those of us on the sidelines, e.g., who
added Meson support to Sage (you?), why?, how hard what is and how
long did it take?, what was involved? Also, to what extent does Meson
replace autotool
Dear developers,
I am excited to announce that SageMath now supports the Meson build system!
This modern alternative to Autotools brings several key advantages:
- *Faster Builds* – Meson significantly reduces configuration and
compilation time due to better parallelism (some benchmark
10 matches
Mail list logo
