On Monday, 31 March 2025 at 17:38:06 UTC-7 Trevor Karn wrote:
What was the original intent behind having the dual requirements of (i) a
system python and (ii) a SPKG python both in Sage? What (once upon a time)
did having a SKPG do that couldn't/shouldn't/wouldn't be done by the system
python?
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 11:45 PM Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
> > 1. Are we allowed to have the latex engine set for xelatex and assume the
> > user has this feature (if they care about compiling the pdf doc)? (The only
> > other exception is uplatex for the Japanese docs.) If not, do we want to
>
> 1. Are we allowed to have the latex engine set for xelatex and assume the
user has this feature (if they care about compiling the pdf doc)? (The only
other exception is uplatex for the Japanese docs.) If not, do we want to
make that a dependency specifically for the Chinese translation pdf
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 9:48 PM Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>There has been a PR giving a Chinese (simplified) translation of the Sage
> tour:
>
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/39792
>
> We have had a long-standing problem of getting the pdf docs to compile, but
> the au
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 07:37:23PM -0500, Trevor Karn wrote:
> What was the original intent behind having the dual requirements of (i) a
> system python and (ii) a SPKG python both in Sage? What (once upon a time)
> did having a SKPG do that couldn't/shouldn't/wouldn't be done by the system
> pytho
Hi everyone,
There has been a PR giving a Chinese (simplified) translation of the
Sage tour:
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/39792
We have had a long-standing problem of getting the pdf docs to compile, but
the author was apparently able to solve the issue by using xelatex.
However, I
On 2025-03-30 14:19:21, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> I propose to remove python3 (and sqlite - which has no other consumers)
> from the list of Sage spkgs (packages).
> Anno 2025 one has sufficiently many non-Sage ways to make sure a good
> enough python3 is available for use with Sage.
This is no long
On 31 March 2025 14:36:30 GMT-05:00, Trevor Karn <> wrote:
>If a user does not already have python3 installed on their system, this
>proposal would make installing python3 a prerequisite for installing Sage
>right? Is that something that we want to make users do?
Well, Sage cannot be installe
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 7:55 AM Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>
> Wouldn't that entail to have to maintain support for a wider selection of
> Python versions ?
Not bigger than at present.
>
> Le lundi 31 mars 2025 à 05:05:51 UTC+2, dim...@gmail.com a écrit :
>>
>> I propose to remove python3 (an
Dear Sudarshan,
Thank you for your interest in GSoC. However, this mailing list is for
issues related to development of Sage, not for GSoC proposal discussions.
Please post such messages to the sage-gsoc list.
Thank you,
Travis
On Monday, March 31, 2025 at 5:08:53 AM UTC+9 dandgawal...@gmail
10 matches
Mail list logo
