Re: [sage-devel] Re: RFC: demote giac to optional

Don't worry, I won't try to convince sage maintainers that they should not downgrade giac, it seems we do have too incompatible views and probably not the same target audience (which may explain that some people here believe giac is about solving a few more integrals than maxima or sympy). Howev

[sage-devel] Re: Remove one of the dancing links implementations

I have been using the c++ implementation of dancing links a lot during the last decade for fun [1,2] and for research. There were some issues in the original C++ code that are now fixed (providing a empty set of rows was crashing sage, also, we can now reset the search from the start, reduction

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Any interest in making building from source on Mac more robust?

Is your branch on the PR branch of https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/39571 ? It should be for the current release. I'll take the incremental testing approach. As a first set of questions: - On the Install from Source Code p

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Any interest in making building from source on Mac more robust?

Thanks, Kwankyu,, I'll take the incremental testing approach. As a first set of questions: - On the Install from Source Code page, the "macOS package installation" paragraph advises the installation of a long list of binary