On Thursday, 12 December 2024 at 12:39:46 UTC-8 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
Great, thank you! This - almost - provides a performance test:
Yes, you would need to convince sage that this is indeed a euclidean ring
(I think for this one the usual norm actually is a euclidean norm). I don't
think tha
That was it. I missed that jmol was optional now. Thanks
On Thursday, December 12, 2024 at 12:40:03 PM UTC-8 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
> This most probably just means that jmol package is not installed. It's
> now optional, you need to explicitly say you want it installed.
> The quickest way woul
This most probably just means that jmol package is not installed. It's
now optional, you need to explicitly say you want it installed.
The quickest way would by just
make jmol
from the directory you built Sage from.
Then try running your test again
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 12:24 PM Richard Quint
Great, thank you! This - almost - provides a performance test:
```
sage: K.=NumberField(x^2-3)
sage: O=K.ring_of_integers()
sage: b=O(a-2)
sage: R. = O[]
sage: f = O(2*a + 4)*z^2
sage: f.gcd(f+1)
...
NotImplementedError: Maximal Order generated by a in Number Field in a with
defining polyno
I have built Sage from source (sage-10.4.tar.gz and sage-10.5.tar.gz) on
four machines with different architectures and different derivatives of
Debian. On all machines the jmol viewer for 3d plots works under 10.4
but not under 10.5. The RuntimeError Traceback is identical on all
machines.
Quadratic rings perhaps? A fair number of those are UFD:
sage: K.=NumberField(x^2-3)
sage: O=K.ring_of_integers()
sage: b=O(a-2)
sage: %timeit b.is_unit()
664 ns ± 4.24 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1,000,000 loops each)
sage: %timeit b.is_one()
55.8 ns ± 0.214 ns per loop (mean ± std.
Marc Mezzarobba wrote:
>> for testing purposes I am in need of an UFD in Sage for which is_unit
>> is significantly slower than is_one.
>
> Matrices?
Woops, I read “a ring” insteand of “an ufd”...
--
Marc
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-deve
'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote:
> for testing purposes I am in need of an UFD in Sage for which is_unit
> is significantly slower than is_one.
Matrices?
--
Marc
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
Dear all,
for testing purposes I am in need of an UFD in Sage for which is_unit is
significantly slower than is_one. Note that, unfortunately, quotient rings
do not seem supported currently.
Background: my pull request https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38924
provides a critical speedup fo
Thanks for all the suggestions. I made a boot disk USB for debian and am
trying that right now. I will report back.
John
On Thursday, 12 December 2024 at 08:18:09 UTC Emil Widmann wrote:
> MX Linux is pretty solid and debian based
> There is a 32 bit build for MX Linux XFCE,
> https://mxlinu
MX Linux is pretty solid and debian based
There is a 32 bit build for MX Linux XFCE,
https://mxlinux.org/download-links/
https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=MX
fluxbox version should be even lighter
dim...@gmail.com schrieb am Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2024 um 18:52:05 UTC+1:
> Debian
11 matches
Mail list logo
