[sage-devel] Re: m4ri, pynormaliz, etc.

On Friday, August 2, 2024 at 6:59:13 PM UTC-7 Aaron Lauve wrote: is it also necessary if I've only made small changes to packages?... where it would ordinarily suffice to just run `sage -br`? Yes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group

[sage-devel] Bug in `factor` for multivariate polynomials over QQbar

The line `R. = QQbar[]; factor(a^2 - 2*c^2)` raises a ValueError: variable name '@c' is not alphanumeric while the same line with `c` replaced with `b` works fine. This happens in a local installation of Sage 10.4 (and 10.5.beta0), but also on the SageCell. -- Peter Mueller -- You received t

[sage-devel] Re: m4ri, pynormaliz, etc.

Duh. Sorry for the trouble. Everything compiled correctly. For future reference, is it also necessary if I've only made small changes to packages?... where it would ordinarily suffice to just run `sage -br`? On Friday, August 2, 2024 at 7:15:42 PM UTC-5 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > Yes, this step i

[sage-devel] Re: m4ri, pynormaliz, etc.

Yes, this step is important. On Friday, August 2, 2024 at 1:21:58 PM UTC-7 Aaron Lauve wrote: > Hmm... > Looking through the install-from-source-code advice, it looks like I may > have forgotten this step: > > .homebrew-build-env > > Is this necessary before I run > > make distclean

Re: [sage-devel] Re: m4ri, pynormaliz, etc.

On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 9:22 PM Aaron Lauve wrote: > > Hmm... > Looking through the install-from-source-code advice, it looks like I may have > forgotten this step: > > .homebrew-build-env > > Is this necessary before I run > > make distclean && make > > if I'm installing on a Mac and am

[sage-devel] Re: m4ri, pynormaliz, etc.

Hmm... Looking through the install-from-source-code advice, it looks like I may have forgotten this step: .homebrew-build-env Is this necessary before I run make distclean && make if I'm installing on a Mac and am using homebrew to manage (many many) packages? On Friday, August 2

Re: [sage-devel] Sage-10.4 fails to build

On 3/08/24 08:06, Niranjana K M wrote: On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 1:29 AM François Bissey > wrote: On 3/08/24 07:17, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On Fri, 2024-08-02 at 07:09 -0700, Niranjana K M wrote: >> At first I had flint-3.1.0 from Gentoo portage.

Re: [sage-devel] Sage-10.4 fails to build

On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 1:29 AM François Bissey wrote: > > > On 3/08/24 07:17, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On Fri, 2024-08-02 at 07:09 -0700, Niranjana K M wrote: > >> At first I had flint-3.1.0 from Gentoo portage. Got same errors and > build > >> failed. The I uninstalled flint and its dependent

Re: [sage-devel] Sage-10.4 fails to build

On 3/08/24 07:17, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On Fri, 2024-08-02 at 07:09 -0700, Niranjana K M wrote: At first I had flint-3.1.0 from Gentoo portage. Got same errors and build failed. The I uninstalled flint and its dependents from Gentoo and let the Sage choose its flint spkg. Again it also fail

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage-10.4 fails to build

On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 09:40:03AM -0700, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > According to your log, this is a build failure using the experimental > option "./configure --enable-system-site-packages". > > This failure comes from use of system NumPy 2; try with > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38227

Re: [sage-devel] Sage-10.4 fails to build

On Fri, 2024-08-02 at 07:09 -0700, Niranjana K M wrote: > At first I had flint-3.1.0 from Gentoo portage. Got same errors and build > failed. The I uninstalled flint and its dependents from Gentoo and let the > Sage choose its flint spkg. Again it also failed with same errors. > These errors,

[sage-devel] Re: AI achieves silver-medal standard solving International Mathematical Olympiad problems

The geometry problem was not fully solved, in the sense that AlphaGeometry2 does not prove that the construction is feasible, as far as I understand, they do not construct point X and Y, they assume that such a construction exists " coll x b c; x != c; foot d i b c; perp x t1 t1 i; cong i t1 i d

Re: [sage-devel] Re: fflas-ffpack install fail

My `conda list`: https://gist.github.com/grhkm21/ac89913f1b168d96b3ffa67f37bcc2d5 config.log and package logs: https://gist.github.com/grhkm21/6146c6da5c884687b28c4de07e6567fb @Dima: As you can see from the output, I *did* install fflas-ffpack via Conda using `conda install fflas-ffpack`. IIR

Re: [sage-devel] Sage-10.4 fails to build

On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 07:09:20AM -0700, Niranjana K M wrote: > At first I had flint-3.1.0 from Gentoo portage. Got same errors and build > failed. The I uninstalled flint and its dependents from Gentoo and let the > Sage choose its flint spkg. Again it also failed with same errors. I can confi

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-10.4 fails to build

According to your log, this is a build failure using the experimental option "./configure --enable-system-site-packages". This failure comes from use of system NumPy 2; try with https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38227, which has a fix. On Friday, August 2, 2024 at 2:49:31 AM UTC-7 Niranjana

[sage-devel] Re: fflas-ffpack install fail

config.log please; also the result of "conda list" please, which gives a lot of relevant info when you try to build within a conda environment. On Wednesday, July 31, 2024 at 12:11:42 PM UTC-7 Gareth Ma wrote: > Hi, I'm running `make build` on latest dev branch, and I get the following > error:

Re: [sage-devel] Re: fflas-ffpack install fail

is there a reason for not using fflas-ffpack from Conda? (as far as I understand, you're building under Conda) fflas-ffpack from the system might not be compatible (e.g. if a different C++ compiler was used) On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 1:24 PM Gareth Ma wrote: > > Bumping this thread, since it's sto

[sage-devel] m4ri, pynormaliz, etc.

I'm trying to update to sage 10.4.rc1 last local-working copy of sage was 10.4.rc0 [lauve@localhost sage %] git branch * develop [lauve@localhost sage %] git pull [lauve@localhost sage %] make distclean && make This aborts with an error building m4ri-20200125 package (error log attached). ..

Re: [sage-devel] Re: save is a memory hog

Hi Julian, somehow reproducing this from the same dictionary loaded from a savefile yields less dramatic results. Here is what I am doing: sage: # this will downlod roughly 150 Mb of data load("http://people.disim.univaq.it/~salvatore.stella/tmp/bar.sobj";) Attempting to load remote file: http

Re: [sage-devel] Sage-10.4 fails to build

At first I had flint-3.1.0 from Gentoo portage. Got same errors and build failed. The I uninstalled flint and its dependents from Gentoo and let the Sage choose its flint spkg. Again it also failed with same errors. On Friday, August 2, 2024 at 5:53:19 PM UTC+5:30 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 2

[sage-devel] Re: fflas-ffpack install fail

Bumping this thread, since it's stopping me from reviewing tickets :) On Wednesday 31 July 2024 at 20:11:42 UTC+1 Gareth Ma wrote: > Hi, I'm running `make build` on latest dev branch, and I get the following > error: > > ``` > Error building Sage. > > The following package(s) may have failed to

Re: [sage-devel] Sage-10.4 fails to build

On 2024-08-02 15:19:03, Niranjana K M wrote: > Dear Sage developers, > Sage-10.4 fails to build on my computer running with Gentoo Linux. > It uses gcc-13.3.1 and python-3.12.3. > Sagemath is the master branch from git. > It fails to build sagelib-10.4. If i search for errors in log i could fin

[sage-devel] Re: save is a memory hog

Hi Salvatore, I couldn't reproduce the problem that you are seeing. sage: R. = ZZ[] sage: D = {R.random_element(): ZZ.random_element() for _ in range(2**18)} sage: save(D, 'deleteme') The above uses a bit of RAM but not the amounts that you are seeing. Usually, I use memray to debug such proble

[sage-devel] save is a memory hog

Dear All, while working with some big dictionaries I realized that save consumes a lot of RAM. Here is an example. Suppose foo is a dictionary whose keys are integer polynomials in three variables and whose values are integers. In my running example it has 342971 entries and it occupies 10 Mb