That means that at least one of bzip2, liblzma, libffi, zlib are being
built by Sage. Can you install system versions of these instead? What does
the message say at the end of running `./configure`?
John
On Wednesday, July 31, 2024 at 11:31:08 AM UTC-7 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
> Is this the
Hi, I'm running `make build` on latest dev branch, and I get the following
error:
```
Error building Sage.
The following package(s) may have failed to build (not necessarily
during this run of 'make all-build'):
* package: fflas_ffpack-2.5.0+sage-2024-05-18b
last build time: Jul 31 18
Did you mean you want your name mentioned in the reference to the
sage-devel discussion in the issue description? Done.
Concerning "licenses" for test cases: anything that's not GPL2+ does not
get included in sagemath. If the bug is important enough to be fixed, it
will be discovered independen
Is this the relevant bit?
If so, what's the cure?
# Checking whether SageMath should install SPKG python3... ##
## ##
configure:39889: checking whether any of bzip2 liblzma libffi zlib is
installed as or will be installed as SPKG
config
On 31 July 2024 14:19:36 BST, 'Martin R' via sage-devel
wrote:
>Yes,
>
>configure:42296: no suitable system package found for SPKG openssl
>
>and I don't think I can change that.
are you trying to build Python?
You should not.
I suppose your system Python does come with ssl etc.
Dima
> l
I've spent the last few days recompiling several versions of GCC and
installing them in /usr/local/gccxx so I can try different versions of GCC
against the different versions of Sage I have.
Yes, I'm building Sage as root (uid = 0).
I will report back as soon as my tests are complete.
Thanks
On Sunday, July 28, 2024 at 11:02:32 PM UTC-7 Kwankyu Lee wrote:
On Sunday, July 28, 2024 at 11:11:03 PM UTC+9 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
All these packages are tested automatically on all supported platforms on
GH Actions, on every beta release.
See for example
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/act
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 7:32 PM Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> This is now:
>
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38459
>
You are missing the `Author` from the original report.
Which license pisses off most SageMath, Inc to
include in future testcases (if any)?
--
You received this message because
This is now:
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38459
On Wednesday 31 July 2024 at 08:46:14 UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 July 2024 at 07:33:47 UTC-7 Georgi Guninski wrote:
>
> I need non-torsion element of Jacobian of hyperelliptic curve,
> would someone give example?
>
> IIRC
On Wednesday 31 July 2024 at 07:33:47 UTC-7 Georgi Guninski wrote:
I need non-torsion element of Jacobian of hyperelliptic curve,
would someone give example?
IIRC something very close to the following worked about
5 years ago, but now I get trivial result.
Session:
#Author: Georgi Guninski
I know nothing about hyperelliptic curves. From the code, it seems
possible that `self._names` is not taken into account properly.
In jacobian_morphism.py, we have
class JacobianMorphism_divisor_class_field(AdditiveGroupElement,
SchemeMorphism):
[...]
def __init__(self, parent, polys, che
Why the following doesn't work?
Session:
#Author: Georgi Guninski
K.=QQ[]
C=HyperellipticCurve(u^5+u+5^2-2);
J=C.jacobian();
print("J=",J);
P=J(1,5);
#output
J= Jacobian of Hyperelliptic Curve over Rational Field defined by y^2
= x^5 + x + 23
--
I need non-torsion element of Jacobian of hyperelliptic curve,
would someone give example?
IIRC something very close to the following worked about
5 years ago, but now I get trivial result.
Session:
#Author: Georgi Guninski
K.=QQ[]
C=HyperellipticCurve(x^5+x+5^2-2);
J=C.jacobian();
P=J(1,5);
2*P
Yes,
configure:42296: no suitable system package found for SPKG openssl
and I don't think I can change that. logs/pkgs/openssl-3.2.2.log doesn't
mention any errors.
Martin
On Wednesday 31 July 2024 at 15:00:24 UTC+2 Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
> FWIW, I don't have this issue on my computer runni
FWIW, I don't have this issue on my computer running the same version of
Ubuntu as you (22.04.4). SageMath 10.4 has been built from source here,
without the need for Sage to build openssl (the system openssl is 3.0.2):
in config.log, there is
## -
I have a problem on a Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS server (likely independent of the
precise release of sage, I tried a fresh build).
I don't know where to start. If I understand the logs correctly, it build
openssl-3.2.2.
Thanks in advance!
Martin
mrubey@ubuntu:~/sage$ ./sage
┌──
16 matches
Mail list logo
