On Wednesday, June 26, 2024 at 7:03:16 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
I have hard time understanding the role of such a board in the current
"0-governance" model
we have. Asking people to advice and then happily ignoring it does not make
much sense.
OTOH such a board would make a lot of sense if
Thank you very much for this initiative!
Best wishes,
Eric.
Le mercredi 26 juin 2024 à 16:10:07 UTC+2, jplab a écrit :
> Dear SageMath Community,
>
> As most of you are likely aware, our communication platforms surrounding
> the development of Sagemath have unfortunately been the scene of
> i
Dime correctly diagnosed the problem, and I just made a trivial PR to fix
it: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38284
John
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 at 15:26, John Cremona wrote:
> In build/pkgs/eclib/spkg-configure.m4 tere is code to check whether an
> already installed version of eclib is new e
there are two tests - and you get the failure on the 2st one, which checks for
equality of versions, in
PKG_CHECK_MODULES.
You need to change '=' there to '>='
(and ./bootstrap)
On 26 June 2024 15:30:53 BST, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>On Wed, 2024-06-26 at 15:26 +0100, John Cremona wrote:
>> In
On Wed, 2024-06-26 at 15:26 +0100, John Cremona wrote:
> In build/pkgs/eclib/spkg-configure.m4 tere is code to check whether an
> already installed version of eclib is new enough. It use to check that the
> version agreed exactly, but now it uses [ge] ("greater or equal") to do
> this.
>
Did you
In build/pkgs/eclib/spkg-configure.m4 tere is code to check whether an
already installed version of eclib is new enough. It use to check that the
version agreed exactly, but now it uses [ge] ("greater or equal") to do
this.
BUT I have version 20240408 installed which has greater than the minimal
Dear SageMath Community,
As most of you are likely aware, our communication platforms surrounding
the development of Sagemath have unfortunately been the scene of
inappropriate behavior, which has impacted our progress and overall
community atmosphere. In light of this, and as part of our ong
I have hard time understanding the role of such a board in the current
"0-governance" model
we have. Asking people to advice and then happily ignoring it does not make
much sense.
OTOH such a board would make a lot of sense if we had a real management
board, constantly active,
and which can be a
