On Friday, May 10, 2024 at 4:19:14 PM UTC-7 julian...@fsfe.org wrote:
There are some means to reuse workflows in GitHub
That's correct.
They are called "reusable workflows", and I use them to provide portability
testing to upstream projects of Sage.
You can read about them in https://github.c
Dear Matthias,
If I read your proposal correctly, it is about removing review from changes
made by "maintainers" and merging things directly into develop without
waiting for the Release Manager.
Mostly, I am opposed to this because changes to the files you list are not
automatically uncontrove
I think I've got it. In `free_module_element.pyx` the method
`FreeModuleElement_generic_dense._lmul_` does the following:
cpdef _lmul_(self, Element right):
"""
EXAMPLES::
sage: v = vector([-1,0,3,pi])
# needs sage.s
Update: I'm afraid I misunderstood - this does call
__mul__, right?
On Friday 10 May 2024 at 15:20:07 UTC+2 Martin R wrote:
> I am trying to fix
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/37976#issuecomment-2104464722
>
> Briefly:
>
> sage: h = SymmetricFunctions(QQ).h()
> sage: v = vector([h[3]+
On Wednesday, May 8, 2024 at 12:18:51 PM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
I've already said while the previous version of this was discussed, is
that it's a huge mess to have different commit rights for different
parts of the tree,
I'm pretty sure that Volker and I can figure this out; there's no n
FWIW, I suggested to implement this feature
in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/37254; I'm thankful to Aman Moon
for implementing this feature and Sebastian Oehms for his help with it.
Obviously a metric such as the number of lines of changes is only a
one-dimensional way to express the
On 9 May 2024 22:46:17 BST, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>I am *very* strongly opposed to these tags. Their cutoffs are arbitrary nor
>they serve no useful purpose as far as I can tell. To this point, they do
>not reflect the difficulty of a review; in fact, they are at best
>counterproductive to
I am trying to fix
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/37976#issuecomment-2104464722
Briefly:
sage: h = SymmetricFunctions(QQ).h()
sage: v = vector([h[3]+h[2,1]])
sage: v * (-111)
({[3]: 1, [2, 1]: 1})
One reason for this is possibly
sage: a = coercion_model.get_action(v.parent(), ZZ, operat
