[sage-devel] Opinions needed from cryptographers

Hi all, I have created issue #37305 to collect ideas about cryptography in Sage. If you have used Sage (or Python) for cryptography before, or just has any opinions about the prompt, please discuss them there. Thanks!

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Question about coercion model

I see, thanks for the clear explanation, indeed "100" * a is absurd. Still, should there at least be some mechanism to handle `int` in this code path? Since the path for `_mul_` works: ``` sage: class Number(Parent): : def __init__(self, x): self.x = x : def __repr__(self): ret

[sage-devel] Re: meson_python build failure: missing tar.gz on sage github?

Thanks for the information. There is something that we need to fix in our configure script. I'll take care of that in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/37319 On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 9:40:30 AM UTC-8 Janmenjaya Panda wrote: > I thank both of you for your reply and support. > > Yes, .

[sage-devel] Re: meson_python build failure: missing tar.gz on sage github?

I thank both of you for your reply and support. Yes, .local/bin was there in PATH. I uninstalled meson (1.3.1), which was by default installed by pip install meson and installed an earlier version (0.63.3) and it worked. Thank you :-) On Tuesday 13 February 2024 at 22:46:13 UTC+5:30 Matthias

[sage-devel] Re: meson_python build failure: missing tar.gz on sage github?

Check if your .local/bin was in your PATH when you ran "make". (It is not enough for it to be in PATH when you run "configure".) This information is in install.log; we cannot see this in the files that you attached. On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 12:52:54 AM UTC-8 Janmenjaya Panda wrote: > Hel

Re: [sage-devel] meson_python build failure: missing tar.gz on sage github?

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 8:52 AM Janmenjaya Panda wrote: > Hello, > I got the following error while (running 'make') building sage from the > forked repo of the source code (This branch (develop) is up to date with > sagemath/sage:develop). > > [meson_python-0.15.0] Thread model: posix > [meson_py

Re: [sage-devel] One year of Sage development on GitHub

On 13 February 2024 00:58:04 GMT, Nils Bruin wrote: >On Monday 12 February 2024 at 15:58:11 UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >What's rotten and decaying - well, the most obvious points are: > >* pynac (memory leaks, bugs, sketchy or no docs, authors left long time >ago) > >* commutative algebra