Re: [sage-devel] Re: Question about cysignals installation

2023-08-16 Thread JC
Thanks for your replies! So is there a way to let cysignals use an older version of Cython? On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 12:36:49 PM UTC-4 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > this seems to be the CI error, something with setuptools version > > 2023-08-04T14:47:05.9834230Z config.status: creating src/co

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Question about cysignals installation

2023-08-16 Thread Dima Pasechnik
this seems to be the CI error, something with setuptools version 2023-08-04T14:47:05.9834230Z config.status: creating src/config.h 2023-08-04T14:47:06.0117040Z config.status: creating src/cysignals/cysignals_config.h 2023-08-04T14:47:06.0928570Z python3 -m pip -v install --no-index --ignore-insta

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Question about cysignals installation

2023-08-16 Thread 'Martin R. Albrecht' via sage-devel
FWIW this PR https://github.com/sagemath/cysignals/pull/174 does this porting, I think. CI complaints but I don’t understand the complaint. On Wed, Aug 16 2023, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > I think your cython is too new (3.0.0). > > Cysignals has not been ported to it yet. > > On Wednesday, August 1

[sage-devel] Re: Question about cysignals installation

2023-08-16 Thread Dima Pasechnik
I think your cython is too new (3.0.0). Cysignals has not been ported to it yet. On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 4:00:24 PM UTC+1 JC wrote: > Dear Sage developers, > > I'm trying to install the cysignals 1.11.2 package in Python 3.9.7 using > pip (on a computer with macOS system and Apple M2 c

[sage-devel] Question about cysignals installation

2023-08-16 Thread JC
Dear Sage developers, I'm trying to install the cysignals 1.11.2 package in Python 3.9.7 using pip (on a computer with macOS system and Apple M2 chip) and have already installed the prerequisite packages Cython and Sphinx, but still failed with some Cython compiling errors (please see the error

[sage-devel] Re: Python PEP 703: no more Interpreter lock

2023-08-16 Thread Nils Bruin
On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 04:20:21 UTC-4 Thierry Dumont wrote: With PEP 703, Cpython will move (slowly) to a non GIL implementation, allowing true multi-threading. It will take time (-> 3.15) and will be optional at the beginning. See: https://peps.python.org/pep-0703/ Which consequences

Re: [sage-devel] Python PEP 703: no more Interpreter lock

2023-08-16 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023, 09:20 Thierry Dumont, wrote: > With PEP 703, Cpython will move (slowly) to a non GIL implementation, > allowing true multi-threading. It will take time (-> 3.15) and will be > optional at the beginning. See: > https://peps.python.org/pep-0703/ > Which consequences for the P

[sage-devel] Python PEP 703: no more Interpreter lock

2023-08-16 Thread Thierry Dumont
With PEP 703, Cpython will move (slowly) to a non GIL implementation, allowing true multi-threading. It will take time (-> 3.15) and will be optional at the beginning. See: https://peps.python.org/pep-0703/ Which consequences for the Python part of Sage ? Are there many parts which could be mu